Earls wrote:
Thanks for the low down
So, does Hagen still own it?
As for Justin's views versus others views.... How could anyone not want the aircraft in the air again? He has done alot for MIA's and wreck locating no doubt. I'd like to hear what he has to say. If there is any plausible argument for not putting these remote tropical location wrecks back in the air again.....Then I'm open ears. I just don't see it...
Neely
There are plenty of good reasons for not putting wrecks like Swamp Ghost back in the air... you'd end up throwing out 70 to 90% of the original airframe. What's the point of going to all that trouble, when a static restoration would retain far, far more originality, and be just as good to look at. My views on significantly deteriorated wrecks are different though... static or airworthy restorations are great, unless they are unique survivors, where it might be better to preserve what you have, rather than toss it all out for a replica. We've discussed this to death so many times though that it really isn't necessary to go into further detail.
Cheers,
Richard
PS. I do believe Mr.Hagen still owns Swamp Ghost, and have seen nothing yet to lead me to believe otherwise. Things like this change rapidly though... so who's to say. It really doesn't matter, so long as the Ghost is preserved.
_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography -
http://www.rmallnutt.com