Future Maintenance - today's warriors vs. yesterday's

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.

This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply
Oscar Duck
  • Oscar Duck
  • Posts: 566
  • Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:02 pm
  • Location: Brisbane Qld Australia

Re: Future Maintenance - today's warriors vs. yesterday's

Sun Dec 27, 2009 6:27 am

JDK please explain why it is the "lunatic fringe" who want to keep an Aarvark going. I'd like to see one. It could be done. Maintaining a full combat system is very different to keeping the airframe flying!
JDK
  • JDK
  • Posts: 6884
  • Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
  • Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
  • Website

Re: Future Maintenance - today's warriors vs. yesterday's

Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:48 am

Oscar Duck wrote:JDK please explain why it is the "lunatic fringe" who want to keep an Aarvark going. I'd like to see one. It could be done. Maintaining a full combat system is very different to keeping the airframe flying!

Hi Oscar,
You are Migace and I claim my five pounds! :lol:

Seen it, paid for it, not going to pay more to see it again. You go ahead though... ;)

Cheers,
Post a reply
Switch to full style

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.

phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.

Board index