This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:18 am
Just been posted on Flypast forum that a decision has been made by the FAA as to which is the real 44-63864 'Twilight Tear'
But the poster isn't saying which one !
I've looked on the FAA website but cant find any info.
Anybody know that will say ?
Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:32 pm
Nearly 500 views and no response?
Someone must know.
Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:33 pm
Waiting on Dick Phillips to comment.
Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:54 pm
*moves closer to edge of seat*
Interesting!
Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:56 pm
Dick Phillips asked me to post this for him:
As far as the real Twilight Tear, 44-63864 is concerned, I am 100% convinced that the real one is in North Dakota with Tri-State Aviation and the one that was presented at Duxford as Twilight Tear, and was thought by many, many folks to be the real one, was a different IDF mustang, using the tail and maybe some other parts from 44-63864, that were discarded for better parts, when Bill Lear had the Israeli Aircraft Industries, build him a good mustang from IDF stocks. That Lear airplane became N251L, and operated out of Geneva, Switzerland before crashing in Iceland on a ferry flight to California.
I have lots of paperwork on the entire history of 864, as does the present owner of the project.
Dick Phillips
Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:34 am
Robbo wrote:Nearly 500 views and no response?
Someone must know.
Someone surely does, but I think he's outta town for the moment...
T J
Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:22 am
Can someone refresh my memory regarding what this is all about? Is this a question of who owns the FAA registration number for a particular pile of parts or an Anorak opinion of which aiplane has the greater mass of parts original to a specific wartime aircraft?
Why does any of this this matter?
Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:46 am
bdk wrote:Can someone refresh my memory regarding what this is all about? Is this a question of who owns the FAA registration number for a particular pile of parts or an Anorak opinion of which aiplane has the greater mass of parts original to a specific wartime aircraft?
Why does any of this this matter?
I'm pretty sure one party has accused others of theft - ie. someone had the wreckage. parts. etc... of a certain aircraft, that should include a dataplate that "belonged" to that airframe - but said dataplate was allegedly removed and missing and turned up with another airframe. Pretty significant theft if you want to rebuild the original airframe and re-register it as the same aircraft.
Ryan
Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:01 am
A friend of mine bought all the remains from the crashsite in Iceland back in the early 90s.It was busted pretty good but a builder.I think it has moved on and to where i dont know.
Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:22 am
bdk wrote:Why does any of this this matter?
Money and status, bdk, money and status.
Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:49 am
bdk wrote:Can someone refresh my memory regarding what this is all about? Is this a question of who owns the FAA registration number for a particular pile of parts or an Anorak opinion of which aiplane has the greater mass of parts original to a specific wartime aircraft?
Why does any of this this matter?
It matters because the owners of the airplanes involved have made quite a big deal about that particular airframe's combat history.
Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:00 am
Hey guys, I'm new here. I've been viewing the boards for a while but was never able to register but i decided to rettry today and it worked

Was just wondering if anybody new If or When our Twilight Tear will be back in the UK? She's a gorgeous Mustang and i would like to see her again.
Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:13 am
Rob.Brindley: It could be wrong, but I remember reading that " Twilight Tear " of The Fighter Collection was sold just before its restoration in Chino.
Anyboby can confirm this information ?
Last edited by
Iclo on Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:17 am
Thanks mate, Will be a shame if she has been sold.. But, There are other mustangs.
Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:42 am
Randy Haskin wrote:bdk wrote:Can someone refresh my memory regarding what this is all about? Is this a question of who owns the FAA registration number for a particular pile of parts or an Anorak opinion of which aiplane has the greater mass of parts original to a specific wartime aircraft?
Why does any of this this matter?
It matters because the owners of the airplanes involved have made quite a big deal about that particular airframe's combat history.
Will the FAA let two planes of the same type be registered using the same serial number?
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.