Warbird Information Exchange

Shuttle Atlantis gets towed back to the OPF to be prepared for her final flight in this nice set of pictures. The last flight for this space veteran will be in the spring...

http://www.launchphotography.com/STS-129_tow.html

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."

THat is the one that is going to end up at the NMUSAF. I just got a e-mail about more fundraising.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager

And here I was thinking that they just parked in the wrong spot and got towed. Man, I'd hate to pay the towing and impound fee on that one!
Guess I am going to have to try to get over there for one of the last shots. It has been years since I made that trek.

_________________

Aviation Illustration Website
http://shepartstudio.com/illustration/

Fundraising attempt aside, that may be in doubt. NASM has dibs on Discovery, but now both Kennedy AND Johnson want flown orbiters (even if, in the case of Johnson, the orbiter will need to be cut apart and reassembled). The service museums (NMUSAF, NNAM, etc) are a step down from the Smithsonian and NASA itself on the rights-of-refusal list.

That would leave Enterprise available. There's a real positive for her anyways: all that's needed is the cost of moving her, as opposed to the full $40+ million for doing the kind of superfund-level hazmat cleanup the three flown shuttles are going to require.

I know this isn't a forum about space flight, but isn't it kind of less-than-sane to retire our shuttle fleet ..... and depend on Russia for access to the ISS? I keep waiting to hear an uproar of protest, and yet .... so far .... nothing.... <crickets chirping>

_________________
Cheers,
Kurt Maurer
League City, Texas

PIC, Ford 6600 pulling Rhino batwing up and down the runway

Given that the shuttles have already cost the lives of 14 astronauts, I'd expect to keep hearing the crickets chirp.

Yes, they should still be flown until there's an operational manned replacement. Problem is, what politician (elected or unelected) is going to stick his neck out given the reasonable odds that there'll be another loss? Last time I heard the official odds were 1 in 250 per flight.

Keep em flyin til we get a replacement!!!!! This should have been planned years ago!! Pretty SAD!!

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005

Group,

While in the Army, I was assigned to Airworthiness Qualification Test Directorate (AQTD), Edwards AFB. When the shuttle landed at Edwards AFB, we provided support.

Once while waiting for the shuttle to land, I figured out how much the speeding ticket would be. This was based on $5 for every mile over the speed limit(100K' @ Mach 20, 90K' @ mach 15, ect....). I don't remember how much it was, but it was a bunch.

I worked 4-5 shuttle landings and never actually saw the shuttle land.

Later I worked Security for NASA, and did get a chance to get up close (look in an engine bay and the lower crew compartment.

Oh to remember when I had time to think of things like that!

Laterrrr
Avn-Tech

There's screaming going on, it's just being drowned out by the NIH at Nay-Say. (as Burt Rutan calls it.)

http://www.directlauncher.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIRECT

Here's where the screaming is going on at a geek level of discussion (warning, highly addictive): http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?board=37.0







When you consider that there have been 129 Shuttle flights and 2 LOV/LOC (Loss of Vehicle/Loss of Crew) mishaps, it's more like 1 in 65.

_________________
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

From the vantage point those pics were taken, was there a trained camera-toting 'gator doing the honors? Whoever got those looks to be in the weeds!

Your absolutely right, it would be very strange for the US to be without a manned system to orbit after all this time.

However, I'd be highly surprised if a replacement, though less 'public' system hasn't been in place for some considerable time. I'd imagine that those 'old fashioned rockets' are not the order of the day either.

Yup, that's the actual. The 1-250 is the projected based on all the post-Columbia safety mods.

NO ONE in any authority wants to have their fingerprints on keeping STS alive ... then getting blamed when another orbiter and crew is lost.

I tried to find that quote by John Young about reconsidering your line of work when extraordinary measures are being taken to identify your body in the event of mishap...

Check this thread out: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index. ... ic=17623.0
I didn't realize that the Shuttle has had so many close calls. Like there were 4 separate ways STS-1 was almost lost, or STS-37 landed 1600' SHORT of the runway threshold. The only thing that saved them was that they were at Eddy and not KSC.(video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDd4JZlBpiM and notice how far from the TDZ camera they are when they touch down.)

_________________
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

No museum in their right mind would pay $40 million for a shuttle so they were dreaming with that. As for the Kennedy and Johnson, they better get cracking on a building to house the shuttle that is climate controlled and will allow for the shuttles to be open to the public. That is their rules right?

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager

I saw this in the link you posted.

"If extreme methods are being taken to identify your body after your dead, maybe you ought to think twice about the job your in" - John Young

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!