Since people seem to think that the off-topic section is for political discussion, something that is frowned upon, I have temporarily closed the section. ANY political discussions in any other forum will be deleted and the user suspended. I have had it with the politically motivated comments.
Post a reply

Possible Military Black Projects

Sun May 29, 2005 3:44 pm

Hey guys:

I was doing some thinking, uh oh... Anyway, I was thinking, "Is it possible to create a wingless aircraft that uses an anti-gravity device"?

I believe we already have the technology to do it, but unfortunately it would require nuclear power. My thoughts are creating a huge high RPM nuclear powered gyro which would create a reaction force to the aircraft's weight. Is it possible? Why or why not?

Sun May 29, 2005 4:42 pm

I also suppose another option would be some kind of nuclear powered jet engine which would run the compressor section off of the nuclear power plant, and use radiation instead of combustion to heat and expand the exhaust air.

I think these designs are plausible, but would require some serious politics to allow! Also, they would have to be huge aircraft and engines.

Sun May 29, 2005 5:04 pm

Hi

How about development on the Coanda Effect

For the model:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/repcotst.htm

For the military applications

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:f3_x ... t%22&hl=en

Regards
Ross

Mon May 30, 2005 3:50 pm

HarvardIV wrote:I also suppose another option would be some kind of nuclear powered jet engine which would run the compressor section off of the nuclear power plant, and use radiation instead of combustion to heat and expand the exhaust air.
It has already been done. The exhaust leaves a significant amount of fallout.

Mon May 30, 2005 4:11 pm

Hi BDK:

I don't think it would if you ran the compressor section off of the reactor. In fact it would be very clean. However if you ran radioactive particles through the combustion cycle, then that would cause pollution.

Mon May 30, 2005 10:08 pm

does project aurora raise a few eyebrows???? probably with big brother lurkers on the site!!! :finga: here's to ya guys!!! regards, tom

Mon May 30, 2005 10:41 pm

Tom Wrote:

does project aurora raise a few eyebrows????


Yes, a friend of my dad, ex-Navy told me in 1986 that he saw a split second photo news leak of the stealth fighter and assured some friends and me of its existence. 3 yrs before it was officially released in 1989.

I asked him at the time "How can you be sure"? He said," I know what I saw".

Mon May 30, 2005 10:57 pm

HarvardIV wrote:I don't think it would if you ran the compressor section off of the reactor. In fact it would be very clean. However if you ran radioactive particles through the combustion cycle, then that would cause pollution.
What combustion cycle? What compressor section? Are you making a nuclear turbofan????

Mon May 30, 2005 11:10 pm

A nuke powered jet turbine has already been tried and abandoned. The first prototype engine weighed in somewhere in excess of 89 tons and filled something like 144,000 cubic feet. The one megawatt reactor flown in the B-36 itself took up about the same volume as a couple of Suburbans.

Tue May 31, 2005 12:21 am

What combustion cycle? What compressor section? Are you making a nuclear turbofan????


Yeah; me and the Col., called Moxie turbine.
Post a reply