Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 8:24 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:24 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
http://www.aia-aerospace.org/national_aerospace_day

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:02 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
I guess it would make too much sence to hold it on the date of the first flight

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:50 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
Matt Gunsch wrote:
I guess it would make too much sence to hold it on the date of the first flight



Actually, they're about a month late. :wink:


"Two years, four months and three days before the successful flights of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk, a birdlike monoplane took to the air at early dawn on August 14, 1901, near Bridgeport, Connecticut, carrying its inventor and builder, Gustav Whitehead, a distance of approximately a half mile." Stella Randolph, The Lost Flights of Gustave Whitehead


Connecticut -- First in Flight



Dan (the still slightly rabid)

Image

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:07 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
if that was the case, where is the proof ? never heard of him, and had it been true, how come he never came forward after the Wrights ?

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:45 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4525
Location: Dallas, TX
Dan K wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
I guess it would make too much sence to hold it on the date of the first flight



Actually, they're about a month late. :wink:


"Two years, four months and three days before the successful flights of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk, a birdlike monoplane took to the air at early dawn on August 14, 1901, near Bridgeport, Connecticut, carrying its inventor and builder, Gustav Whitehead, a distance of approximately a half mile." Stella Randolph, The Lost Flights of Gustave Whitehead


Connecticut -- First in Flight

Dan (the still slightly rabid)

Texas has Connecticut beat...
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/onli ... fbr63.html
:wink:
Does that mean the Connecticut folks are trying to con us?

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:00 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
Matt Gunsch wrote:
if that was the case, where is the proof ? never heard of him, and had it been true, how come he never came forward after the Wrights ?


Matt, you have some reading to do!

After a little research, I don't think there will be much doubt in your mind as to Weisskopf's/Whitehead's achievements. One of his flights in 1902 was observed and written up by a newspaper reporter (in Bridgeport I believe).

Orville Wright agreed to allow the Wright Flyer to be displayed in the Smithsonian ONLY if they agreed to forever recognize Wilbur and him as being first. If the Smithsonian ever publicly acknowledges anyone other than the Wrights as being first they will legally lose the right to display the Flyer.

The Wrights were about profit and recognition. Weisskopf was a homebuilder and tinkerer. Even the Wrights recognized that his engine designs were ahead of theirs. In fact, they made several unpublicized visits to his shop well before their 1903 flight.

Time to give Weisskopf his due. The Smithsonian won't budge.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Last edited by Dan K on Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
RyanShort1 wrote:
Dan K wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
I guess it would make too much sence to hold it on the date of the first flight



Actually, they're about a month late. :wink:


"Two years, four months and three days before the successful flights of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk, a birdlike monoplane took to the air at early dawn on August 14, 1901, near Bridgeport, Connecticut, carrying its inventor and builder, Gustav Whitehead, a distance of approximately a half mile." Stella Randolph, The Lost Flights of Gustave Whitehead


Connecticut -- First in Flight

Dan (the still slightly rabid)

Texas has Connecticut beat...
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/onli ... fbr63.html
:wink:
Does that mean the Connecticut folks are trying to con us?

Ryan



Doh! You got me, Ryan!


Don't get me wrong--the Wrights accomplished a great deal. They just weren't first. No more than CY was first through the sound barrier. This isn't revisionism; just getting the facts straight.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 569
Location: Shalimar, FL
Remember, the Smithsonian pushed Dr. Langley as THE pioneer aviator for years. After the Wright's successful flight, they hired Glenn Curtis to rebuild the Langley bird so that it would eventually fly -- barely.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:34 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
RyanShort1 wrote:
Dan K wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
I guess it would make too much sence to hold it on the date of the first flight



Actually, they're about a month late. :wink:


"Two years, four months and three days before the successful flights of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk, a birdlike monoplane took to the air at early dawn on August 14, 1901, near Bridgeport, Connecticut, carrying its inventor and builder, Gustav Whitehead, a distance of approximately a half mile." Stella Randolph, The Lost Flights of Gustave Whitehead


Connecticut -- First in Flight

Dan (the still slightly rabid)

Texas has Connecticut beat...
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/onli ... fbr63.html
:wink:
Does that mean the Connecticut folks are trying to con us?

Ryan

HA! HA! :lol: The key is "successful" first flight. A destroyed aircraft as a landing regimen is a bit lacking. Points to
Brodbeck for trying. :wink:

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:40 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5199
Location: Stratford, CT.
Dan K wrote:
RyanShort1 wrote:
Dan K wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
I guess it would make too much sence to hold it on the date of the first flight



Actually, they're about a month late. :wink:


"Two years, four months and three days before the successful flights of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk, a birdlike monoplane took to the air at early dawn on August 14, 1901, near Bridgeport, Connecticut, carrying its inventor and builder, Gustav Whitehead, a distance of approximately a half mile." Stella Randolph, The Lost Flights of Gustave Whitehead


Connecticut -- First in Flight

Dan (the still slightly rabid)

Texas has Connecticut beat...
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/onli ... fbr63.html
:wink:
Does that mean the Connecticut folks are trying to con us?

Ryan



Doh! You got me, Ryan!


Don't get me wrong--the Wrights accomplished a great deal. They just weren't first. No more than CY was first through the sound barrier. This isn't revisionism; just getting the facts straight.


Long live the legend of Whitehead! The great debate! But I bet every state has some local legend.

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AG pilot, Google [Bot], tulsaboy and 289 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group