Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 11:56 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: W.A.S.P. Museum
PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:47 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 1715
Location: Safford, Az
Took a little trip yesterday afternoon to visit the WASP museum in Sweetwater. Never been here and it was really neat. They have a PT-26 that flys. Overall its really nice and they have big plans for expansion :D .

Monument to the 1830 woman who trained and the 38 who gave their lives for their country
Image

Image
First hanger built in 1929.
Image
Original wishing well except for the statue
Image

Image

Image

Image
This hanger & the next are all thats left of original to the base.
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: W.A.S.P. Museum
PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:57 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1132
steve dickey wrote:
Took a little trip yesterday afternoon to visit the WASP museum in Sweetwater. Never been here and it was really neat. They have a PT-26 that flys. Overall its really nice and they have big plans for expansion :D .


It is a pretty neat little museum. Oddly enough Steve I rode past there on the motorcycle yesterday after noon, heading back to Altus from Big Spring. I almost stopped there but I was trying to beat the rain. That didn't work, I got caught in it right about Abilene!

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:02 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 1715
Location: Safford, Az
Yeah Brad they were gonna fly the PT to Breckenridge also and as I was heading back I saw that big ol storm and I hoped they made it back OK, or turned back???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:49 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Any pictures of the Bamboo Bomber project that was given to them by the CAF a few years back?

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:26 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 1715
Location: Safford, Az
retroaviation wrote:
Any pictures of the Bamboo Bomber project that was given to them by the CAF a few years back?

Gary



Gary I talked to a fella that ran the FBO after the PT left and asked about it, basically according to him it is in bad shape and according to him not worth restoring even to static! According to him you could go get another one cheaper than restoring that one??? I wanted to see it but he said it was too difficult to get to it?????? I guess it has a bunch of junk stored around it and its hard to see?? I didn't press the issue though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:54 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
steve dickey wrote:
retroaviation wrote:
Any pictures of the Bamboo Bomber project that was given to them by the CAF a few years back?

Gary



Gary I talked to a fella that ran the FBO after the PT left and asked about it, basically according to him it is in bad shape and according to him not worth restoring even to static! According to him you could go get another one cheaper than restoring that one??? I wanted to see it but he said it was too difficult to get to it?????? I guess it has a bunch of junk stored around it and its hard to see?? I didn't press the issue though.


Hmmm......Sounds to me that...well, I reckon I better just bite my tongue. :? All I can say is if it was that bad, then why did they beg us for it and then accept it? Even after they took the airplane, they kept after us for more parts, which we found a few for them. Yup....I better just keep quiet on the remainder of my thoughts. :roll:

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:04 pm
Posts: 641
Location: Central Texas
Well at least you got to see the PT-26 Steve. I visited there the weekend I helped Gary on the Thud and the PT-26 was in one of the other hangers - closed off of course. The lady at the desk said they were working on her. My luck of course.

Nice pictures. The shots of the statue and the sign on the TSTC Campus are great. I remember passing it many times while I was a student there :) When I was going to school there, they still had one barracks building and the rec. center that were part of the base at one time. I am guessing that they dated from the 50s or 60s though, not WWII.

I didn't know anything about the Bamboo Bomber project. Get another one cheaper than restoring it?! What the...??? Didn't see it anywhere around the museum hanger. Wonder if it is in one of the hangers closer to the college?

It is a nice little museum and it will be good when they can expand so that they can incorporate some a/c!! Yes, it was a little warm the day I was there.

-Derek


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Bamboo Bombers
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:09 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1665
Location: Baltimore MD
If the spars are toast on the UC-78, it is cheaper to go get another one with good spars than to build new ones. The front spar is a very big, single piece laminated wood job that would be a very complicated glue-up and manufacture- the rear one is just a bit smaller feat. If the spars are toast, the chances are the rest of the wood in the wing is toast. By the time you are done, you would be over $100,000 into the wing of an airplane which sells for $80,000 to $100,000 tops. So the FBO might be right.

Gary, what did the spars look like anyway?

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:38 am 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
Cool.

I have driven by on I-20 many times but have never stopped. (In fact I was by there Sunday as well...@ 6:30 PM - funny)

Thanks for the pictures.

Zane

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bamboo Bombers
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:37 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Forgotten Field wrote:
If the spars are toast on the UC-78, it is cheaper to go get another one with good spars than to build new ones. The front spar is a very big, single piece laminated wood job that would be a very complicated glue-up and manufacture- the rear one is just a bit smaller feat. If the spars are toast, the chances are the rest of the wood in the wing is toast. By the time you are done, you would be over $100,000 into the wing of an airplane which sells for $80,000 to $100,000 tops. So the FBO might be right.

Gary, what did the spars look like anyway?


There's no question that the airplane would only be good for a static display, BUT, that's exactly what they wanted it for. I just don't understand it. I would like to see the museum myself one day, but I doubt I could keep my mouth shut about that project.

I wonder where it is?

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:04 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:10 pm
Posts: 1073
Location: San Marcos, TX
Yes, the wing spars are toast on the UC-78. They were repairable, until one of our members took a wood chisel to them to see how deep the soft (rotted) wood went. He went way deep, not knowing the soft nature of the wood. He thought it was hard oak.

We had found a couple of possible repairs, but were looking at $10K, which the wing decided would be better spent on the Scatterbrain Kid II. The UC-78 supported the CenTex Wing a lot more than the P-38 ever did, but that's another story.

Poor old N64513 was close to a total restoration, but for the spars. I believe his name was Terry Sullivan, in Schreveport, LA, had taken the fuselage and bead blasted it, replaced some tubing, sanded and varnished the woodwork, and was ready to cover it whenever we got the fabric and dope to him. Then the project officer died (the same one who took the chisel to the spars) and the new one decided we needed to get all the pieces back together. Then the wing did nothing with it and eventually sent it to CAF HQ. After years of sitting around there, several members got a little money together and bought 64513 (sans engines and props) and donated it to the WASP museum. It was sad to think she would never fly again, but I was excited that at least she was going to get back together again. So sad nothing has happened yet. I was in the right seat on her final flight. That's another exciting story!

_________________
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: UC 78 spars
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:20 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1665
Location: Baltimore MD
Gary,
From my standpoint, having dealt with all kinds of projects, project owners, workers, and managers, aren't you giving the museum a bit of a hard time without details? I mean, it sounds like the UC 78 is inside, not in the weather at Midland, and in care of a museum that thought enough to operate a PT-19. I'm not affiliated with the museum, nor have I ever had contact with them, but it sounds like they may be moving in the right direction. Is there more to this story? Did they abuse a restorable airplane? I really appreciate your insight into what is really going on in various operations and usually agree with your analysis, but I don't see the basis for your criticisms of this one.

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UC 78 spars
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:35 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Forgotten Field wrote:
Gary,
From my standpoint, having dealt with all kinds of projects, project owners, workers, and managers, aren't you giving the museum a bit of a hard time without details? I mean, it sounds like the UC 78 is inside, not in the weather at Midland, and in care of a museum that thought enough to operate a PT-19. I'm not affiliated with the museum, nor have I ever had contact with them, but it sounds like they may be moving in the right direction. Is there more to this story? Did they abuse a restorable airplane? I really appreciate your insight into what is really going on in various operations and usually agree with your analysis, but I don't see the basis for your criticisms of this one.


You make good points, and it is certainly highly likely that I'm out of line here. If so, I sincerely apologize to those involved. However, I got my feathers ruffled, I guess, because one of the guys that really pushed for HQ to give that airplane to the W.A.S.P. Museum, lives here in the Midland/Odessa area, and also just happens to be the one who said that "because of Gary Austin, FIFI will never fly again!" Soooo, yeah...I tend to be a little critical of just about anything that involves that fine fellow.

So, with that being said, along with what you said, I would certainly love to know the current status of the airplane. If it's simply located in some inside storage, out of sight from Museum guests until it can be worked on, then that's fine. However, if they're just putting it aside because it's too big of a hassle, then that kinda pisses me off...which I think isn't too unreasonable for me to feel that way.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group