Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 4:44 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:51 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3299
Location: Phoenix, Az
It is very simple not to blame the guy, unless he crossed a taxyway, or a runway, he did nothing wrong, he was taking pictures. You seem to be the type that goes along with what ever the TSA says. I for one am not, I was out at Buckeye airport several months ago, it is a airport that is over 40 miles from Phx, there is nothing around there except cows and a egg farm. The TSA made them install security fencing around the airport, it was not needed, it was a waste of money, and a added pain if you want to fly into there.

When I got interested in planes, I would ride my bicycle 5 miles to the airport and ride around the ramp to look at the planes, if you try that now, you will be arrested.
Where did our freedom go ? and before you say it is because times change, I say BS, it is because some pencil pusher has to justify thier job and if you are happy, they are not trying hard enough.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:38 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Matt Gunsch wrote:
... You seem to be the type that goes along with what ever the TSA says....

C'mon Matt, no. Not really.

Not my reading of it.

(And which 'you' are you referring to?) If you think there's anyone pro- TSA here, feel free to point them out. I'm sure we can make them look silly. WIX luv TSA? :)

As to 'where did our freedoms go' that's a bigger question. To me, here, the issue is if one could establish if the photographer was on a 'airline security' area brought in by (arguably overzealous) anti-terrorist rulings, or trespassing on an airfield safety area.

If we want to push back the un-necessary and paranoid 'anti-terrorist' rulings, restrictions and behaviour, that needs to be done to win the battles - and that means no political hyperbole (Nazis etc.) no 'wandering innocent' or to prove a point, not by power or threats of violence but by due process. Yes, you have to beat them at their own game. Making em look silly is probably the only fun option that'd be successful.

The issues are the same around the world at the moment. At least much of the TSA's behaviour is evidently over-reactive and not likely to be sustainable if attacked through the right channels - there are more insidious battles, like these frustrating fences.

Just by 2d.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:30 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Ohio
Matt Gunsch wrote:
It is very simple not to blame the guy, unless he crossed a taxyway, or a runway, he did nothing wrong, he was taking pictures.


Well, here's a few quotes from the conversation that follows the original story...one from a witness, and one from the photog himself.

Quote:
was there says:
Before you make any conclusions, he walked away from the "Tarmac" and crossed an active runway. All with out any ones permission.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 10:06AM


To which the photog responded...

Quote:
Danno says:
Hey "was there". You are right, I was ignorant of the rules and Laws. Clear something up for us, in layman's terms, would you? What are the differences between Tarmac, Runway, Taxi Way, and what color stripes differentiate the rules they imply?

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 10:38AM


THis is interesting as well.

Quote:
Airport Ops (different airport) says:
I work for a airport (not this one) in the operations department.

This has nothing to do with being USSA or him having a camera. It just has to do with an incursion on a movement area. You can have people walk all around the general aviation ramp area, but any taxiways & runways are off limits without permission from the control tower. Not permission from the pilots. Pilots have to follow the same rules or the same result would happen to them.

So this guy made a mistake. VPD (vehicle/pedestrian deviation) are somewhat common, but each airport handles them differently.

This is a none event and not the result of a class war or Obama taking away our guns.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 12:05PM


Another informed opinion here...

Quote:
pthomas745 says:
Please read the post again by Airport Ops...he is the only one that has figured this ridiculous blog post out.

The guy taking pictures was probably on an airport movement area. The "cop" who came up was probably from airport security.

"Homeland Security" will have nothing to do with this incident. The FAA's incursion report ( if they filed one) will go to the Flight Standards District Office.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 9:47PM


And lastly, this guy seems to have been part of the process somewhere along the line based on the information he shares...

Quote:
Anonymous says:
pthomas745 and Airport Ops are absolutely correct. This had nothing to do with the fact that the man was taking pictures. It was a runway incursion, and it was filed with FAA as such. This guy was in the Movement Area without the permission of the Airport, and without being in radio contact with the Tower. That is criminal trespass. There are signs all over the airport fence at Addison that tell you as much. The pilots of the airplane are not authorized to give him permission to enter the movement areas. Neither is the flight museum. The issue at hand is the safety of aircraft operations. It has jack-nothing to do with DHS or TSA.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 10:04PM


I wanted to avoid making a textwall out of this, but it seems that these quotes have become important to the conversation here.

Matt Gunsch wrote:
You seem to be the type that goes along with what ever the TSA says.


Matt, I think you've completely misinterpreted the point I've been trying to make this whole time.

I make every single bit of my living, and support my family, as a photographer. Like Danno,I am not a fulltime aviation photographer. This means that, if I go into a new situation, I need to find out what rules govern my conduct. I'm the team photographer for the Columbus Crew of Major League Soccer, for example. There are places I can shoot from that media photographers cannot, and those rules are based on the bylaws on FIFA, the international soccer governing body. If RandomRookieSoccerShooter tries to shoot from between the benches, security will escort him away from there.

Similarly, if I want to shoot from the opposite side of the runway because the light's better over there, I'm not going to go walking over there without confirming with airport authorities that I can do that. I've probably had a 75% success rate when I've asked to do such a thing (including the time the tower gave me a radio and told me to call in as 'White Taurus 1' before I moved onto the runway). The reasons to do this are twofold...first is that I get the shots I need this time, and second is that next time, they remember me as someone who followed the rules and didn't cause a potential operatonal problem.

That is exactly what Danno the Photog did NOT do. He wandered into areas where he shouldn't have been without clearing it with the proper authorities. Therefore, the intial fault is his.

Lastly, whether we like it or not, times have changed. Just recently the FBI broke up a plot in New York that included bombing synagogues and shooting down a military aircraft with a shoulder-fired missile. I can remember flying without having to go through security, but times and events forced this to change.

I am NOT defending TSA, nor am I saying that everything done in the the name of security is justified. I maintain, however, that the fault here starts with the photographer.

Longest post I've ever made on here.

_________________
"Anyway, the throat feels a bit rough...the legs have gone...but I'm still able to chant, so let's get going."

Joe Strummer, 1999


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:07 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4528
Location: Dallas, TX
fotobass wrote:
I am NOT defending TSA, nor am I saying that everything done in the the name of security is justified. I maintain, however, that the fault here starts with the photographer.

Longest post I've ever made on here.

And a good post at that. With the additional information it's quite clear there was a pretty serious mistake made there. No matter how much I dislike the current version of airport "security" - perhaps some of it really is necessary - especially in some of the bigger cities. I can tell you that if I saw some guy cross the runway in front of me, or an active taxiway without permission I'd be a bit bothered!

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:10 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
RyanShort1 wrote:
fotobass wrote:
Longest post I've ever made on here.

And a good post at that.

Seconded. And you failed to achieve the WIX hits by pointless politics, mental ability challenge and an international incident. Get outa here. :D

RyanShort1 wrote:
I can tell you that if I saw some guy cross the runway in front of me, or an active taxiway without permission I'd be a bit bothered!

That's just 'cos you drive a weeny-likkle airplane. Fly C-17, you'd not even feel the bump. ;)

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:46 pm
Posts: 256
Location: midwest
Matt Gunsch wrote:
...I for one am not, I was out at Buckeye airport several months ago, it is a airport that is over 40 miles from Phx, there is nothing around there except cows and a egg farm. The TSA made them install security fencing around the airport, it was not needed, it was a waste of money, and a added pain if you want to fly into there....


The fencing you mention has been installed at more than a few smaller airports in the last 2-3yrs. A side effect is that at many of these airports you now have no way out of the fence except through the FBO and surprise! suddenly ramp fees/ access / facility fees have popped up at many of these same FBO's. There's little more frustrating than dropping passengers off at 6am in some little airport in IA only to be stopped on the way back to your plane because "you didn't pay the fee yet". The usual justification is "your people used our facility". Makes one's blood boil when you park on the city owned ramp and need to get to a car in the city owned parking lot but there's a toll way in between. Thanks again TSA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:30 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Ohio
JDK wrote:
Seconded. And you failed to achieve the WIX hits by pointless politics, mental ability challenge and an international incident. Get outa here. :D


Okay...lemme pull this out. I can save it, you Republicratted Demopublican. I couldn't think my way outta a paper bag, so there! Oh, yeah...and aren't you from Cuba or South Africa or New Zealand or somewhere?

JDK wrote:
RyanShort1 wrote:
I can tell you that if I saw some guy cross the runway in front of me, or an active taxiway without permission I'd be a bit bothered!

That's just 'cos you drive a weeny-likkle airplane. Fly C-17, you'd not even feel the bump. ;)


thunkthunkthunk.

_________________
"Anyway, the throat feels a bit rough...the legs have gone...but I'm still able to chant, so let's get going."

Joe Strummer, 1999


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:22 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
brucev wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
...I for one am not, I was out at Buckeye airport several months ago, it is a airport that is over 40 miles from Phx, there is nothing around there except cows and a egg farm. The TSA made them install security fencing around the airport, it was not needed, it was a waste of money, and a added pain if you want to fly into there....


The fencing you mention has been installed at more than a few smaller airports in the last 2-3yrs. A side effect is that at many of these airports you now have no way out of the fence except through the FBO and surprise! suddenly ramp fees/ access / facility fees have popped up at many of these same FBO's. There's little more frustrating than dropping passengers off at 6am in some little airport in IA only to be stopped on the way back to your plane because "you didn't pay the fee yet". The usual justification is "your people used our facility". Makes one's blood boil when you park on the city owned ramp and need to get to a car in the city owned parking lot but there's a toll way in between. Thanks again TSA.

A recent case where this has happened in Australia to an outback airfield (and when we say outback, we mean a long way from anywhere like a terrorist target!).

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:54 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:58 am
Posts: 1054
Location: In Your Screen
I think the message is clear nobody like what the TSA is doing. So rather than talk about them more here, give your representatives and senators a call.

_________________
"No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" R.R.

Welcome to the USSA! One Nanny State Under the Messiah, Indivisible with Tyranny, Higher Taxes, Socialism, Radical Environmentalism and a Loss of Income for all. Boy I'm proud to be a part of the USSA, what can I do to raise taxes, oh boy oh boy!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:58 am
Posts: 469
Location: Montreal
I've been saying this for awhile now... You guys are on a bad, bad curve ! Very soon, American GA airports will be totally innaccessible, just like they are in Europe ! The TSA and other agencies are hard at it.

Goodbye Young Eagles, Friendly fly-ins and open houses unless you do something, and soon.

Here's what is waiting for you: http://www.passion-aviation.qc.ca/cascais.htm

Getting arrested for taking pictures... :roll: fortunately, stupidity is not lethal !

_________________
Michel C
Thousands of a/c pics at Passion-Aviation


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:33 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Michel C-GNCJ wrote:
I've been saying this for awhile now... You guys are on a bad, bad curve ! Very soon, American GA airports will be totally innaccessible, just like they are in Europe ! The TSA and other agencies are hard at it.

Goodbye Young Eagles, Friendly fly-ins and open houses unless you do something, and soon.

Here's what is waiting for you: http://www.passion-aviation.qc.ca/cascais.htm

Getting arrested for taking pictures... :roll: fortunately, stupidity is not lethal !


Yes, Michel, we know, we know! Unfortunately, the general public doesn't care at all about general aviation, so nothing will change for a while.

It think it will have to get real, real ugly before enough people put pressure on Congress to put pressure on the TSA to back off.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:30 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Ohio
Does anyone actually read threads they post in any more?

_________________
"Anyway, the throat feels a bit rough...the legs have gone...but I'm still able to chant, so let's get going."

Joe Strummer, 1999


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:11 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
fotobass wrote:
Does anyone actually read threads they post in any more?


No!

:D

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:33 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
It is a HOT BUTTON issue and as such, people's emotions tend to overcome logic, reason, FACTS and such! Threads that reach people's personal frustrations cause reactions initially to the news that triggered it and then they ramble on, often take on a life of their own, ranting on and on and on and....what were we taking about?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:42 am
Posts: 450
PLEASE READ THIS:

The guy was invited to take pictures here on the CFM ramp by the crew of the B24. This was early morning before the museum opened. He was told to wait on the ramp until the B24 got back. On his own, he followed the B24 down the taxiway on foot. He then crossed the parallel Taxiway. Then crossed the ACTIVE runway, to get a better shot. The police were called by the Tower and held him while a background check was run. When everything came back good, they released him. He has appoligized and admitted he was wrong. What more do you need?

So he makes a big joke about it and I have to explain it since he came through our ramp, unknown to me. I get a call at home wanting to know why I let this guy through the gate. The TSA had nothing to do with it. And WHO uses the term "Tarmac" to describe a ramp except the media?

_________________
Image
Blue Skies,
Doug


www.cavanaughflightmuseum.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 219 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group