Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 8:31 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Experts
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:17 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1665
Location: Baltimore MD
Maybe they'll get the guys who recovered the PBM to consult.

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:19 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Blah blah blah. I don't believe anything they say anymore. :roll:

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:11 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2708
Location: NP, NJ, USA
-Insert Giant Crab joke here-

:roll:

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Northern VA, USA
Sasnak wrote:
With TBD's being so ultra-rare, it's a shame to leave the shallow airframe in place for scuba divers.


I find that prospect absolutely atrocious.

They're spending a heck of a lot of money just to haul resources out there, and back, to recover one aircraft. That's sunk money that's going to be spent, regardless of how many aircraft are going to be recovered.

And they're going after the more difficult (ok, that's a relative concept, given 50' vs 150') aircraft to bring up. It makes no sense that they wouldn't recover BOTH aircraft, because for something as ultra-rare as a TBD that'll provide much better return on the investment.

Unless ...

The "we're going to leave one behind for scuba divers" statement is a bluff to motivate other investor(s) (individual and/or institutional) to pony up additional money and support for the expedition.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ?????
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:36 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
If you want a laugh watch the EAA timeless voice (?) video interview with
Richard Gillespie on their webpage :shock:
Insurance salesman to aviation archeology expert in one easy lesson :roll: :roll:
http://www.eaa.org/apps/timelessvoices/VoicesDetails.aspx?VoicesID=211

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Last edited by Jack Cook on Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:41 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2309
Is it April 1st again?

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ????
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:47 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
http://www.mefeedia.com/entry/2059447/

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:59 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
i'm pretty cynical of tighar's operation. i won't be taking the news with a grain of salt...... more like a chunk of salt.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ?????
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 2:14 am
Posts: 130
Location: Pa
Jack Cook wrote:
If you want a laugh watch the EAA timeless voice (?) video interview with
Richard Gillespie on their webpage :shock:
Insurance salesman to aviation archeology expert in one easy lesson :roll: :roll:
http://www.eaa.org/apps/timelessvoices/VoicesDetails.aspx?VoicesID=211


That took me only 2 minutes - watched the whole Steve Hinton video instead

Mark D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:50 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
warbird1 wrote:
Have TIGHAR even gotten permission from the Island's government AND the NHC or whatever they are called today. The article doesn't even mention that.

More than likely..since 2006 the Navy and TIGHAR have been looking at the TBD's together.
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... ght=jaluit

Strange Days..I wonder what the Navy saw on the TIGHAR resume that spelled "success" to them? :shock:

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:30 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Ohio
airnutz wrote:

Strange Days..I wonder what the Navy saw on the TIGHAR resume that spelled "success" to them? :shock:


Maybe, given their past history of supporting aircraft recovery, that's exactly why they gave TIGHAR the green light.




I can't believe y'll left that sitting there.

_________________
"Anyway, the throat feels a bit rough...the legs have gone...but I'm still able to chant, so let's get going."

Joe Strummer, 1999


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 12:50 pm
Posts: 34
Location: Frederick, Maryland
I bet the late Bill Surgi is smiling today. Bill worked for years to get someone to recover a TBD. Bill---we miss you. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:36 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5672
Location: Minnesota, USA
deleted by author

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Last edited by Dan K on Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:48 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3299
Location: Phoenix, Az
airnutz wrote:

Strange Days..I wonder what the Navy saw on the TIGHAR resume that spelled "success" to them? :shock:


Easy, Tell a lie often enough and it will be believed to be the truth...........

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:28 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1143
Location: Caribou, Maine
Sasnak wrote
Quote:
Even better yet, they can restore both TBD's to perfect condition, keep one for themselves, and trade the NASM for the SB2C Helldiver, thus completing the WWII dive-bombers in the national collection (Pensacola)


NASM is planning to restore the Helldiver in the marking sof past-Director Don Engen. They would not be looking to trade it for something else, particularly an airplane that had to be totally rebuilt after 60 years of submersion in marine water.

As to TIGHAR's recovery, getting the TBD out of the water is the easy part. Nothing is said about what would then become of it. Who would restore it, where would it be displayed. A few days of exposure to atmospheric oxygen while deciding what to do next would do more damage to the airframe than 60 years of saltwater immersion. They are better off leaving it there than doing a bad job of the post-recovery.

Having kept up with TIGHAR since their "Midnight Ghost" project in Maine, the group has a jump-to-conclusions ethic that makes the creationists and conspiracy theorists seem respectable. Aircraft recovery should be left to professionals who have learned from much experience and more than a few mistakes. My guess is that TIGHAR will make all those mistakes at once, and then not even benefit from them.

As to having TIGHAR recover both airplanes while they are at it, let us see one get recovered successfully before they tackle the other.

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group