Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri May 02, 2025 3:29 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 7:42 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Just saw a clip on the news of a JAL 747 that sucked up a cargo container as it pushed back. It looks like it wedged in tight in the #1 engine intake. :shock: How often does this sort of thing happen? First time I've seen it on the news! At least they noticed it and did not attempt take-off!! Must have made a bit of noise!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8045086.stm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:10 pm
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, TEXAS
"believed to be a cargo container"?

As in "believed" to be Santa Clause?

They had video of the Cessna that crashed into the porta-potties.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 8:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:52 am
Posts: 64
Location: Hong Kong mostly but UK sometimes...
Think you would know that it was there somehow as even at idling the engine parameters would have been interesting...

Collisions with ground equipment are not uncommon and ground staff are relied on to give the all clear but this is the first time I've heard of a container getting in there :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 8:32 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Guess it's better to have sucked in the cargo container than the ground crewman walking the wing tip. From the movie clip, it looks like they are out a good bit from the gate. I wonder if someone just drove by too close as they were spooling up. How much do those empty units weigh?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:34 pm
Posts: 187
Location: NW Mississippi
Has happened before.

http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l133/ ... tainer.jpg

Sully


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
wow!! put a square block in a round hole!! sounds like an aptitude test!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 3:00 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Modern, ultra high bypass engines (CF-90, 4084, TRENT, GENXT) can and will pull you in if you are too close to them or wearing something baggy like a rain suit or poncho. And you are heading into the 'MECHANAMATIC' it makes mounds and mounds of shredded mechanic'.
In my DC-10 classes I used caution the students that both ends of a CF-6 (JT-9's too) running on the ground was a real hazard to their safety all the time, and if the aircraft shifted aft and the nose gear 'ground shift' switch was activated by extending the nose strut, the engines would go to 45% or flight idle automatically. In that scenario if you were launching and wearing a rainsuit or poncho the engines can suck you in from the nose gear comm plug port next to the nose strut and you will have 1.31 seconds to aim for the hub spinner inside the 10 foot diameter inlet (no IGV's like on a JT-8), out the back the exhaust blast will knock you a$$ over teakettle up to 1/4 mile behind one running, that's why carriers flying DC-10/11's usually waited until they were clear of any terminals or windows before lighting off the center engine.
The CF-90 on a triple 7 is 13.5 feet in diameter, it can swallow a 737 fuselage and some in service are making in excess of 125000 lbs/thrust and will evolve to over 170000 lbs/thrust in the future. :shock:
Like Elmer Fudd said 'be vewwy, vewwy careful'

For some reason ,this thing insists on putting the 'cool' emoticon where I want it to say JT-8

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Brenham, Texas
The Delta incident was in one of those "oops" photo collections that went around the web a while back.

_________________
"I love the smell of 100LL in the morning."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group