Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:17 pm
Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:29 pm
the330thbg wrote:JDK wrote:Mod post: Mike, take it to PM or leave it alone, please. Posts deleted.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:51 pm
the330thbg wrote:
Grow up.
There was not even anyone important on the plane and if the terrorists wanted to take it out, or the white house out., it would have already happened.
What century are you living in?
Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:19 pm
Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:42 pm
BHawthorne wrote:the330thbg wrote:
Grow up.
There was not even anyone important on the plane and if the terrorists wanted to take it out, or the white house out., it would have already happened.
What century are you living in?
I think my post was rational and to the point. Your personal attacks as an answer on the other hand are out of line. The public has no right to know the flight schedule of the president's aircraft whether he's on it or not. Nothing in your post is insightful or helpful.
Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:06 pm
the330thbg wrote:Does the government have the right to frighten the heck out of it's citizens due to their lack of overall sensibilities?
Nice government.![]()
There is no reason they could not have come up with a 'cover' story. Like.., 'hey NY.., issue a statement that there will be low flying aircraft over downtown in the morning. It is all planned and safe. Thanks.., love, The Whitehouse"
See.., how was that?
Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:34 pm
Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:15 pm
the330thbg wrote:
Does the government have the right to frighten the heck out of it's citizens due to their lack of overall sensibilities?
Nice government.![]()
There is no reason they could not have come up with a 'cover' story. Like.., 'hey NY.., issue a statement that there will be low flying aircraft over downtown in the morning. It is all planned and safe. Thanks.., love, The Whitehouse"
See.., how was that?
Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:26 pm
Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:05 pm
BHawthorne wrote:the330thbg wrote:Say it was a privately owned warbird that got clearance from the FAA to do low level scenic photo shoot. Still the same problem? The clearance was there. I think people are being played for fools here by coordinated media and politicial mouthpieces. Just my 2 cents.
Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:06 pm
RyanShort1 wrote:the330thbg wrote:Does the government have the right to frighten the heck out of it's citizens due to their lack of overall sensibilities?
Nice government.![]()
There is no reason they could not have come up with a 'cover' story. Like.., 'hey NY.., issue a statement that there will be low flying aircraft over downtown in the morning. It is all planned and safe. Thanks.., love, The Whitehouse"
See.., how was that?
Or better yet - "We are going to have a low flying large jet fly in over the city in order to test certain system reaction times to any threats in order to better protect the city. Do not be surprised to see a large aircraft and some fighter airplanes. We think the previous administration left a few holes..."
They could've made political hay out of it!
Ryan