Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 23, 2026 4:18 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 pm
Posts: 656
Few cool pic's, may be old news?
Image
Image
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:04 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Cool shots! Thanks for posting. I believe that one of these aircraft (probably even one of those shown) survives at the Quonset Point Air Museum. Really interesting transition between piston and turbine power.

Cheers,
Richard

PS. In looking at these photos I can't for the life of me see where the air intake sits for the jet engine. Can anyone tell me where it is?

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:09 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
very cool stuff. I'd never seen those before. Thanks for posting.

By the way, I noticed in the pictures that there's a little problem with the airplane, which may have lead to its short career.

With the way the main gear retract into the wing, it would make it impossible for the gear to tuck in properly when the wings are folded in flight.

(Tough in cheek)

Oh, just thought of another thing. Wouldn't the fact that the airplane had TWO engines render it ridiculously heavy? How did this airplane perform?

And just a guess, but was the jet engine used in this one the same from the T-33?

-David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:16 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5672
Location: Minnesota, USA
I hate to bust your bubble ya'll, but those pics don't resemble the Curtiss XF-15 in the slightest.

Try Ryan FR-1 instead:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FR_Fireball

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:16 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
Just one problem. That is the Ryan Fireball......

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:11 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3299
Location: Phoenix, Az
There is 1 survivor, it is with Planes of Fame, and it is a Ryan Fireball

Image

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: If not for Mr. Maloney
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 895
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
It makes you wonder what the warbird world would look like today had Mr. Maloney never existed. It's not just a matter of looking at the current Planes of Fame collection, think of all the a/c and parts he saved that are no longer in the family collection. Too bad he never ran into a TBY Seawolf of a B-32 Dominator. I doubt the Navy would have saved an example of the Fireball.

_________________
Albert Stix Jr.
"Work is the curse of the drinking class"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: clever air intake
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 355
Location: Kellogg, ID
...I can't for the life of me see where the air intake sits for the jet engine. Can anyone tell me where it is?

It took the Soviet intelligence community many months to figure this one out also. The unusual, but very cleverly designed canopy when opened, would suck the propwash into an internal intake behind the pilot's seat.

This worked well for leaked photos such as the one showing a run-up on the flightdeck.

After the first in-flight test, however, Curtiss quickly sold all rights to Ryan who changed the designation, hence the initial confusion with the post.









:D Okay I had to do it since I didn't get a post in 9 days ago....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:09 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
RMAllnutt wrote:

PS. In looking at these photos I can't for the life of me see where the air intake sits for the jet engine. Can anyone tell me where it is?


Inboard leading edge of the wings...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 pm
Posts: 656
I had no clue found the website.Got pic's in a email?
http://prototypes.free.fr/fr1/fr1-1.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:27 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3299
Location: Phoenix, Az
there was a story of a test pilot pulling along side a formation of Hellcats, shutting down the radial engine and feathering the prop, then pulling away from them.

There were 2 Fireball survivors, but the other was lost in the arson fire at the San Diego air museum.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
Assuming you mean Curtiss XF15C.


Dan K wrote:
I hate to bust your bubble ya'll, but those pics don't resemble the Curtiss XF-15 in the slightest.

Try Ryan FR-1 instead:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FR_Fireball


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:02 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5672
Location: Minnesota, USA
famvburg wrote:
Assuming you mean Curtiss XF15C.


Dan K wrote:
I hate to bust your bubble ya'll, but those pics don't resemble the Curtiss XF-15 in the slightest.

Try Ryan FR-1 instead:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FR_Fireball



Nope, I actually meant the XF15C-1. But now that you mention it, it doesn't look like an XF15C or an XF-15 either.

Thanks for helping me get back in touch wth my anal-retentive side. :lol:

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:27 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4674
Location: Cheshire, CT
For 10 points can anyone give us the name assigned to the Curtiss XF-15C?
I know what it is, so I'm out of the competition!
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:23 am
Posts: 321
The air intakes for the General Electric I-16 turbojet were located in the inboard leading edge of both wings. How about a quote from the Flight Manual which states 'Approximately 7 minutes full-power operation can be obtained from the aft engine but this is reduced one minute for every five minutes at idling speed'? The Fireball had a forward tank of only 45 gallons of kerosene for the weedy little jet and a rear tank of 125 gallons of gasoline for the Wright Cyclone. A single drop tank could be carried to augment the piston engine.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group