Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:02 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:23 am
Posts: 321
Lightning wrote:
Howdy

Im sorry to say, but I feel that this is just a waste of a good engine !
Allison's would be better off being used in American WW2 Aircraft

Lightning


Do I detect the teeniest bit of patrioteering here? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:00 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 2491
Location: New Zealand
What engine should the aircraft utilize?, there are few Klimovs available......

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Yak
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:52 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3246
Location: New York
warbird51 wrote:
Mike wrote:
I wonder if this is the Russian conversion of the ex-TFC Yak-11 that languished in the storage yard out the back of Planes of Fame at Chino for a while after its arrival from the UK?


And we have a winner!!

There is no scoop on the top because the carb. air is supplied from the wing root. Like a Bearcat with a 2800-CB installed


Excellent. I knew I could trust yankee ingenuity to find some way to engineer around needing a scoop on top of an Allison.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 2:53 pm
Posts: 299
Location: UK
If this is the ex TFC one (built alongside OFMC's) the scoop arrangement was sorted out in Russia, I recall having a conversation with the late Mark Hanna about is some years ago whilst they were overcoming the issues, he really didn't want to have a scoop on the top of the cowling as the others had.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:07 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3246
Location: New York
Aha, russkie ingenuity -- only thing better than yankee ingenuity!

August


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
Glyn wrote:
Lightning wrote:
Howdy

Im sorry to say, but I feel that this is just a waste of a good engine !
Allison's would be better off being used in American WW2 Aircraft

Lightning


Do I detect the teeniest bit of patrioteering here? :?


More like "trolling" if you ask me.

_________________
Chad Veich
CWVeich Models
www.cwvmodels.com
Scale Model Design & Construction


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:18 pm
Posts: 263
Yak 11 Fan wrote:
If this is the ex TFC one (built alongside OFMC's) the scoop arrangement was sorted out in Russia, I recall having a conversation with the late Mark Hanna about is some years ago whilst they were overcoming the issues, he really didn't want to have a scoop on the top of the cowling as the others had.


We're interested to see how much manifold pressure we'll get when we fly it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:18 pm
Posts: 263
Yak 11 Fan wrote:
Quote:
warbird51 wrote:
I never did quite understand the fact that, although European operators have managed to cope with the quirkiness of the Russian systems (compressed air for everything - engine start, flaps, brakes, gear retraction) perfectly well for over 30 years, US restorers seem to feel the need to 'Americanize' everything about the Yak C-11.


Because, if you want to fly your aircraft and maintain it, you need parts availability. That is why most U.S. operator's "Americanize" them. If you flew them or worked on them, you would understand.


We managed to restore and operate 2 very successfully in the UK for a good number of years, both aircraft are still flying, 1 in the UK (first flew 18 years ago after restoration) and one in Germany, both are stock aircraft.


Well, good for you. I see you are in Europe. As I said, parts availability is the key. In Europe, you may have a better time of finding brakes and tires for the Yak. Over here they are nonexistant. If you fly the a/c frequently, you need spare parts availabliity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:55 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3246
Location: New York
I'm sure warbird51 is making a valid point. My hat is off to US operators who go the extra mile and source the stock parts, whether from Europe or wherever. And it's unfortunate that none of them is doing that with an -11 at the moment -- in fact, I haven't seen a stock Yak-11 fly in the US since G-AYAK in 1982. But I realize not all owners are made of money, and they still want to fly their planes.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
k5083 wrote:
Certainly looks nice. I don't see ducting for an air scoop on top? Wonder if this will be the first ersatz Yak not marred by a scoop up there. I never tire of seeing these, although I do wish there were still some stock Yak-11s around.

August


Maybe not the first, I don't see a scoop on the one in this thread.

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=89272

_________________
Chad Veich
CWVeich Models
www.cwvmodels.com
Scale Model Design & Construction


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:03 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
k5083 wrote:
I'm sure warbird51 is making a valid point. My hat is off to US operators who go the extra mile and source the stock parts, whether from Europe or wherever. And it's unfortunate that none of them is doing that with an -11 at the moment -- in fact, I haven't seen a stock Yak-11 fly in the US since G-AYAK in 1982. But I realize not all owners are made of money, and they still want to fly their planes.

Another cause of the difference is that the UK's CAA won't let you make substantial mods to a type - or fly 'Experimental' or equivalents, IIRC, - so it's as is or not at all. More detail welcome from those who have to deal with it!

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:03 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4403
Location: Maypearl, Texas
Is the back lower part of the fuselage covered with fabric??

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:07 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Lynn Allen wrote:
Is the back lower part of the fuselage covered with fabric??

Yak 11 yes. Yak 3/9 metal over tube frame, IIRC.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:53 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3246
Location: New York
Chad Veich wrote:
k5083 wrote:
Certainly looks nice. I don't see ducting for an air scoop on top? Wonder if this will be the first ersatz Yak not marred by a scoop up there. I never tire of seeing these, although I do wish there were still some stock Yak-11s around.

August


Maybe not the first, I don't see a scoop on the one in this thread.

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=89272


Cool; I don't see one either. Although I know there are a few out there with flush NACA type intakes that would be hard to see from that angle.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:15 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4403
Location: Maypearl, Texas
JDK wrote:
Lynn Allen wrote:
Is the back lower part of the fuselage covered with fabric??

Yak 11 yes. Yak 3/9 metal over tube frame, IIRC.


Roger that and thanks.....

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 282 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group