Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 3:17 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Turkeys
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:56 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11474
Location: Salem, Oregon
Image
TBF landing on the USS Cowpens 1943
Image
TBFs of VT-5 attacking the Marcus Islands 1943
Image
TBF of VC-21 overflying the jeep carrier USS MARCUS ISLAND CVE-77
Image
TBF in the catwalk after a night trap gone astray

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 7:11 pm
Posts: 48
Location: Iowa
I like the Turkeys but always wondered why they used an enclosed ball turret, seems unusual on anything other than a larger bomber and a Navy aircraft and why is it I rarely see the belly gun?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:20 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
I would think that the turret gave a greater range of fire and ease of aiming that big heavy .50. Add the faster speed of the Avenger (compared to it's predecessor) and you really start having problems slewing a big heavy gun around and firing it accurately. As for not seeing many pics of the belly gun, I would assume that most pics are shot when NOT in the active combat zone, and thus that .30 gun would be in the stow position most of the time and only popped out when enemy action might be expected.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ????
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:53 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11474
Location: Salem, Oregon
Later versions on the TBF/M-3 deleted the .30 tunnel gun mostly
to save weight.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 7:11 pm
Posts: 48
Location: Iowa
Well that would make sense. Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 7:10 pm
Posts: 648
Location: tempe, az
Did the turret guns actually shoot down any aircraft?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Funny you should ask, I am currently reading "Samurai", the story of Saburo Sakai, one of Japans top aces. Reading yesterday, he was blasted from the air by the tail gunners of an Avenger flight (he mistook them for wildcats and flew right up behind them). Ooops! He was severely wounded and barely made it from Guadalcanal back to base in Rabaul. So I imagine at least a few went down in flames.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Turkeys
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:59 pm
Posts: 842
Location: Redmond,Oregon
Holedigger,
In "Samurai",it was either an error in translation or an error by Martin Cadin,but Sakai attacked a flight of SBD's and not TBF's.I have just been reading John B. Lundstrom's book "The First Team and the Guadalcanal Campaign" which gives a very detailed account of Sakai's flight on 7 August 1942 that cross-references both US and Japanese official records as well as diaries and other sources.

According to Lundstrom,"Ahead at 7,800 feet he [Sakai] noticed what appeared to be eight Grumman fighters in tight formation almost begging to be ambushed.Unfortunately for him the targets proved to be Lt. Carl H. Horenburger's eight VB-6 and VS-5 SBDs still toting their 500-pound bombs.They observed Zeros and closed formation even more to meet their attack.Too late did Sakai realize his disasterous mistake,but he had commited to a low-deflection stern attack into the muzzles of sixteen .30-caliber machine guns"

The story continues in detail,but I don't want to quote too much from the book.I do highly recommend this book and Lundstrom's earlier book "The First Team" which covers in detail the activities of US carrier fighters from Pearl Harbor through the Battle of Midway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:42 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Interesting. It would have to be beyond a simple error or mistranslation as it states in the book

"The enemy planes were not fighters, but bombers, the Avengers torpedo planes, types I had never seen before. From the rear they looked exactly like Wildcats, but now their extra size was visible, as were the top turret with its single gun and the belly turret with another 50 caliber gun."

Oops, wrong word? NOT! Author making things up? Possible The fact that Sakai received a severe head wound in the fight, perhaps his memory was VERY bad and was influenced by others stories or his own muddied memories OR the authors leading/probing questions filled in the gaps wrongly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:00 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Atlanta, GA
Other than photos from his bio, are there any infrequently seen pix around of President Bush and his Avenger - or maybe planes from his unit or time frame ... surely Jack has access.

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:04 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11474
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
It would have to be beyond a simple error or mistranslation as it states in the book

It's called writing fiction. Caiden did that even if it was for a non-fiction book :shock: :idea:

Sorry no VT-51 photos a few VF-51.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group