Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:24 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:17 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Great news from the Guard !

Now about that USAF thang, would someone please pass the Koolaid ? :roll:

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:29 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
All I mean is let's just welcome a good thing, and maybe it will catch on.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:40 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
It IS !! The only reason those guys are being left alone is that the Navy worked the deal with Mazzolini !

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:41 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4527
Location: Dallas, TX
mustangdriver wrote:
All I mean is let's just welcome a good thing, and maybe it will catch on.


Hmm, like hangaring my P-51 (someday) at Robert Gray? :roll:

Not sure where that is going...

I'm glad to see Doc get a hangar. Just hope there aren't some kind of strings attached - although I'd suspect some local citizens will probably try to protest this "waste" of taxpayer money.

What I'm more curious about is what progress (if any) has been made and what the current status of the project is. It seems like things must be progressing slowly if at all.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
RickH wrote:
It IS !! The only reason those guys are being left alone is that the Navy worked the deal with Mazzolini !


How does the navy have anything to do the ANG hangar? That is what we are talking about. The USAFM is not going after people flying warbirds, just not theirs. I know all about the deal worked for the B-29 as I worked on the restoration of the PBJ that started the deal. You are the one that needs to back of of the koolaide.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:04 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Hey Doc may get some more help this way. Some Aircraft have been restored quite nicely through the help of USAF units or ANG units more specifically. The NMUSAF's A-36 for example. Then Shoo Shoo.

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:03 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Also the NMUSAF helped get 909 back in the air after it crahsed at KBVI

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:37 am
Posts: 848
Location: Moncks Corner, SC, USA
RickH means that "Doc" was removed from the USAF inventory and transferred to the Navy in March of 1956, so the NMUSAF has no hold on "Doc".

Walt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:14 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
RyanShort1 wrote:

I'm glad to see Doc get a hangar. Just hope there aren't some kind of strings attached - although I'd suspect some local citizens will probably try to protest this "waste" of taxpayer money.

What I'm more curious about is what progress (if any) has been made and what the current status of the project is. It seems like things must be progressing slowly if at all.

Ryan


All the speculation on this thread is one of the reasons I wasn't able to say anything about the hangar arrangement on my Kansas Aviation Museum thread. The individual at the museum who gave me the information about the storage deal said that the B-29 folks weren't going to make a huge deal about it. An announcement with little fanfare (in my opinion, probably so the "concerned taxpayers" and politicians wouldn't go nuts) was all that the Doc people had initially planned.

As far as progress on the airplane, from what I've gathered there is some work going on at another location on both outer wing panels. As the article stated, the actual airframe is in storage for the winter, so kudos to the Guard for putting her up for a little while.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:12 am
Posts: 871
Second Air Force wrote:
RyanShort1 wrote:

I'm glad to see Doc get a hangar. Just hope there aren't some kind of strings attached - although I'd suspect some local citizens will probably try to protest this "waste" of taxpayer money.

What I'm more curious about is what progress (if any) has been made and what the current status of the project is. It seems like things must be progressing slowly if at all.

Ryan


All the speculation on this thread is one of the reasons I wasn't able to say anything about the hangar arrangement on my Kansas Aviation Museum thread. The individual at the museum who gave me the information about the storage deal said that the B-29 folks weren't going to make a huge deal about it. An announcement with little fanfare (in my opinion, probably so the "concerned taxpayers" and politicians wouldn't go nuts) was all that the Doc people had initially planned.

As far as progress on the airplane, from what I've gathered there is some work going on at another location on both outer wing panels. As the article stated, the actual airframe is in storage for the winter, so kudos to the Guard for putting her up for a little while.

Scott


Scott thanks for the update on the restoration status.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:23 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Second Air Force wrote:
RyanShort1 wrote:

I'm glad to see Doc get a hangar. Just hope there aren't some kind of strings attached - although I'd suspect some local citizens will probably try to protest this "waste" of taxpayer money.

What I'm more curious about is what progress (if any) has been made and what the current status of the project is. It seems like things must be progressing slowly if at all.

Ryan


All the speculation on this thread is one of the reasons I wasn't able to say anything about the hangar arrangement on my Kansas Aviation Museum thread. The individual at the museum who gave me the information about the storage deal said that the B-29 folks weren't going to make a huge deal about it. An announcement with little fanfare (in my opinion, probably so the "concerned taxpayers" and politicians wouldn't go nuts) was all that the Doc people had initially planned.

As far as progress on the airplane, from what I've gathered there is some work going on at another location on both outer wing panels. As the article stated, the actual airframe is in storage for the winter, so kudos to the Guard for putting her up for a little while.

Scott


That is all I was trying to say.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:35 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2707
Location: NP, NJ, USA
Glad to hear Doc will be inside. :)

That was very generous of the ANG to allow them to use the space too. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 4:30 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
It's a great thing for Doc to be indoors, politics be damned.

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group