Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:24 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 3:56 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
I think they should do a 1 for 1 swap of the B-17 for Swamp Ghost. PNG would be happy as they would have a more or less "restored" aircraft, and the Air Force would get an extremely rare B-17 in return.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 1181
Location: Tulsa, OK
APG85 (Scott)

I agree with you that if you build a building that you're going to host visitors with, you will have to have some of the basics. I'm just pointing out that basic hangar construction doesn't cost $100/sq foot. At that highly inflated price, you'd still have a 300,000 sqft building, which is a monster. If you build a smaller building, with more of the bells and whistles, it's still not going to cost $30 million. I think that $30 million probably could account for land acquisition, moving the aircraft, restoring the aircraft, building a really, really nice building, and having some opening/first year capital. But even then it's an incredibly nice project, more than most every aviation museum starts with. I'll bet Castle, Hill, and some of the other former AFB museums would LOVE to have $30 million to play with. I just think that, absent owernship of the aircraft and a sugar daddy, that's an unreaslistic number.

On a separate but connected note... when does anyone think that the NMUSAF might consider an approach similar to that used in Britain with the Spitfires? What would it take for the NMUSAF to consider replacing all of the pre-1950 aircraft with fiberglass replicas? Could you set up an arrangement where private parties could purchase the aircraft for the cost of replacing them with the replicas? Maybe even do it in an auction format, such that the NMUSAF could gain much needed funds for the restoration of some of the gems in its collection, or for the acquisition of missing pieces? Just a thought...

kevin

_________________
FOUND the elusive DT-built B-24! Woo-hoo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:44 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4669
Location: Cheshire, CT
I, for one, don't like the idea of someone coming in and pulling their aircraft from a display that has been together for many years. It's sad and hard on those individuals who sweated to create something.

The problem is these aircraft need to be taken care of and if this current round of discussions or threats gets things moving down there, then that is great. If not, then perhaps the aircraft would be better served by placing them elsewhere where they can get the care they deserve with someone who has the abilities and funds.

The New England Air Museum has returned many aircraft that were on loan from the Air Force and Navy because they couldn't house them properly. As hard as it is for those of us who love them, it's best for the aircraft. The ones NEAM has let go have been restored and most are currently on display. A far cry from sitting outside in another New England winter!

I hope they get their act together to keep the collection intact, but if not, there are many deserving locations that will benefit in the end.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:50 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4527
Location: Dallas, TX
warbird1 wrote:
I think they should do a 1 for 1 swap of the B-17 for Swamp Ghost. PNG would be happy as they would have a more or less "restored" aircraft, and the Air Force would get an extremely rare B-17 in return.


Huh? :roll:

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:52 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2951
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
It wouldn't surprise me if the B-24 ended up going to the NASM eventually. They have been after one for years and have a good "trade" relationship with the NMUSAF...

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:49 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2347
Location: Atlanta, GA
There was some good discussion in this thread as well:

http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... sc&start=0

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: vulcan xm606
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:24 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 1694
Location: canada
Just how bad is XM606? Looks like she has had a repaint at somepoint?

_________________
Cheers,
Peter

________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:54 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I heard that the Vulcan may get moved to Wright Patt. But at this point I would chalk it up to hangar talk.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:10 pm
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, TEXAS
peter wrote:
Just how bad is XM606? Looks like she has had a repaint at somepoint?

I'm not an expert on what the ravages of time and elements on aircraft, but it doesn't look too bad to me. I took many pictures of that plane the times I was there and compared them to the pictures I took of the one in Nebraska, XM573.

It is sitting on its tires and the front ones are flat, but so was the NE Vulcan. Bird droppings in the wheel wells, but aside from that the wheel wells looked in about the same shape.

Some corrosion on the bare metal around the exhaust and one of the cockpit windows may be broken, or maybe pushed in (couldn't really tell). All in all, one of the better displays there.

Since the plane was given specifically to Barksdale, wouldn't moving it to Wright-Patterson be a no-no. Maybe the Barksdale museum could give it to the CAF and the CAF could trade it for, I dunno', maybe an F-82.

Since this thread, I have been wondering what happened to the UC-64.


Last edited by cozmo on Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:44 am
Posts: 257
Gotta wonder how much "the powers that be" monitor this website, and if a previous thread a few months ago was the little birdie telling them to go pay a visit down south-or reason for another museum to reiterate their interest.

Funny there are very few black helicopters at the various air museums....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:26 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
cozmo wrote:
peter wrote:
Just how bad is XM606? Looks like she has had a repaint at somepoint?

I'm not an expert on what the ravages of time and elements on aircraft, but it doesn't look too bad to me. I took many pictures of that plane the times I was there and compared them to the pictures I took of the one in Nebraska, XM573.

It is sitting on its tires and the front ones are flat, but so was the NE Vulcan. Bird droppings in the wheel wells, but aside from that the wheel wells looked in about the same shape.

Some corrosion on the bare metal around the exhaust and one of the cockpit windows may be broken, or maybe pushed in (couldn't really tell). All in all, one of the better displays there.

Since the plane was given specifically to Barksdale, wouldn't the Wouldn't moving it to Wright-Patterson be a no-no. Maybe the Barksdale museum could give it to the CAF and the CAF could trade it for, I dunno', maybe an F-82.

Since this thread, I have been wondering what happened to the UC-64.


The aircraft are owned by the NMUSAF, and are displayed at barksdale.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:10 pm
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, TEXAS
This guy took even more pictures than I did:
XM606


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:26 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2347
Location: Atlanta, GA
So, a few weeks have passed with no speculation as to the Barksdale airplanes or whether or not SSSB will remain at NMUSAF. Since we already know that one bullet took out Kennedy and we didn't really go to the moon, surely there's more room for speculation on these corroded old planes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:06 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
I understand the NMUSAF is training a secret squad of Ninja commandos who will sneak into warbird hangars and night and torch the spars.

Meanwhile, the CAF is training a secret unit to sneak into the NMUSAF at night and replace all the aircraft with fiberglas replicas, and fly the originals to a secret base in Texas, which will then declare it's independence from the U.S.

Time for my meds...

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:26 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
All coming to the underground bunker at Boerne Stage. Shhh....don't tell anyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group