Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 5:13 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Anybody Flown a Kitfox?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:18 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
I just met a guy who is buying a Kitfox, and wants me to help him fly it. I have never flown one. Anybody got any experience and/or advice?

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 11:58 am
Posts: 127
Bill, What Mk# is it and what engine? They are very docile airplanes with good performance with the 912 Rotax. The two stroke 583 Rotax also gives good performance but the two stroke engine operates a little different than a four stroke. The MkIV and earlier models are a tight fit for two big guys. The V is a little better. Has very Cub like handling and performance. I fly a friend's that has the Rotec 7 cyl radial on it and it sounds and looks way cool. Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:34 pm
Posts: 187
Location: NW Mississippi
I have flown and maintained a KitFox with the 582LC engine.
The two-stroke engine is "different" but the handling is very good.
It jumps off the ground and landing has very little roll out.
It has good control characteristics, the full length flaperons are extermely responsive.

You will enjoy it.

Sully


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:12 am
Posts: 389
Location: Akron.OH
My dad built, owns & flys a series 5 Outback. He has a Continental IO-240 and the Speedster kit on it. He also put large (tundra looking) tires and a nice big tailwheel. I have flown it many times. It is nicely balanced on all axis, and has a super gentle stall with no ill affects (never spun it, but would take extra effort to get it to spin). The airplane does not bleed speed easily though, and we have found very little stall speed difference between down flaperon settings 1 and 2, so usually just use 1. Be prepared for a considerable nose down pitch associated with deploying flaperons. The rudder is big and effective.

Keep in mind there are many different models, ie; 1 thru 7, with alot of engine options, and they are homebuilt, so handling can certainly vary from machine to machine.

_________________
Life's a Pitts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:59 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
Bill Greenwood wrote:
I just met a guy who is buying a Kitfox, and wants me to help him fly it. I have never flown one. Anybody got any experience and/or advice?


Bill,

That's like asking one of the guys if they've ever ridden a moped or worse... :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Thunder Mustang lineage
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 355
Location: Kellogg, ID
"...a moped or worse"

Ah, but remember this design was a stepping stone for Dan Denney who then went on to give us the phenomenal Thunder Mustang!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 11:58 am
Posts: 127
Quote:
That's like asking one of the guys if they've ever ridden a moped or worse... :twisted:


Paul, I've also flown ultralights and even a powered parachute. Guess that's kinda like riding a skateboard. :shock:. Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 11:58 am
Posts: 127
L. Thompson wrote:
"...a moped or worse"

Ah, but remember this design was a stepping stone for Dan Denney who then went on to give us the phenomenal Thunder Mustang!


I gave Dan Denney his first warbird flight in my SNJ and I got to fly the Avid MKI. I think he got the better deal. Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 261
Location: Midwest
Bill Greenwood wrote:
I just met a guy who is buying a Kitfox, and wants me to help him fly it. I have never flown one. Anybody got any experience and/or advice?


I have lots of time in a IV with 912. Wonderful easy flying plane. Stalls are non-existent....simple pitching motions 50-75 feet lost each cycle, walk it down with rudder and flaperons remain effective well below airspeed reads.
What not to do? Do NOT try to full stall land (if tailwheel version) with full flap deployment....you will run out of back stick and end up nailing the mains...firmly! This depends on the builder as there was nothing stated on how to install stops or what travels recomended for flap operation. The airplane has such remarkable performance, there is little need for flaps anyhow.
Descent is easily controlled in a manner foreign to most who snub such light aircraft...they usually have fixed pitch and are geared engines...the type C gearbox with 2.2 ratio is a dramatic airbrake.....pull the power, point it down, drop the left wing, put the entire right rudder in and you can slip past 50ft obstacle with limited speed gain while dropping 500 ft of altitude in seconds. I have only flown them with droop tips and have not found the crosswind conponent yet!
Good luck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:34 pm
Posts: 187
Location: NW Mississippi
Quote:
I think he got the better deal.


No doubt.

The Kitfox was OK for bombing around the local area. As a mechanic I found some of the "homebuilt" aspects not to my liking. Most of which were corrected. I have flown a couple of two-strokes and never felt completely comfortable.

When my wife saw me fly a Mini-Max with a 36hp engine she realized how desperate I was to get into the air.

Sully


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 11:58 am
Posts: 127
Go ahead and fly it Bill. Just like the J3 Cub it is one of the safest airplanes in the world. It can just barely kill you. Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:30 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3299
Location: Phoenix, Az
As the others have said, it is a very easy plane to fly and you should have no problems with it. I will send you a PM with someone to talk to abou it.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:12 am
Posts: 389
Location: Akron.OH
T33driver wrote:
Bill Greenwood wrote:
I just met a guy who is buying a Kitfox, and wants me to help him fly it. I have never flown one. Anybody got any experience and/or advice?


Bill,

That's like asking one of the guys if they've ever ridden a moped or worse... :twisted:


In the game of metaphors, the Kitfox is only a moped because you have to use your feet to operate it properly! While, the T-33 is a 50cc scooter (beep beep) in the world of F-22's. :D :lol: :wink: :twisted:

_________________
Life's a Pitts


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 pm
Posts: 702
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Ive got a few hours in Kitfox No. 3.

My buddy and I had a blast in the thing.

Anything over a 35 mph headwind and we could get the thing to fly backwards. It was a two-stroke, so to mix the fuel we would pour in the gas and oil, then we would both grab a wing and shake the snot out of the plane. It was a little cramped with the doors closed, but great to fly on a warm day when you could have both doors open for a little more elbow room.

Two things I didn't like however were that it only had brakes on one side and it utilized a pull cord to start. The biggest problem with the pull cord was, though it was in the cockpit, you couldn't get enough of a stroke to get the engine started unless you were standing outside.

_________________
Curtis Block

I've seen too many airplanes destroyed by the term "Static Restoration."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Thanks
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:59 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Thanks guys for all the info. In the back of my mind there is something from years ago that gives me caution about the plane, but I can't for the life of me remember what it is. When they firsts came out they made a splash, haven't heard much lately.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 259 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group