Vessbot wrote:
gary1954 wrote:
Vessbot wrote:
What is the author ignorant of, and what makes him such a dumbass?
UHhhhh helloooo!!! Are you serious. Maybe the FAA should ground ev ery aircraft, prohibit all departures too for fear of a frickin bird strike. Obviously the author of the article is " Sensitive" and needs a laxative. While his jaw was dropped, its a shame it didn't fill with water. H:aving been in the military and law enforcment, I thought that I have already heard it all...until now. Cry me a river, build a bridge and get over it. ITS A BIRD. I suppose the aviator purposly targeted that specifice bird. Let me think about that for a moment....Uhmm like NO! Was a FAR violated? Dunno, as I don,t know what the FAR is for flying over water, don't they only apply to o ver land and populated areas
Yeah the author is a crying ( insert your choice of descriptive), eats a lots of cheese, because he sure must whine a lot.
Ya'll have a nice day
I'd say it's his prerogative to cry over wildlife, no? So that aside, what is he ignorant of, and what makes him a "dumbass" or "stupid?"
Certainly it is his prerogative to cry over wildlife, not taking that away from him.
What I find obsurd, is the fact that he is attempting to make a vortex out of somthing that is rediculous.
Hey, I'm a sensitive guy, I cried when old Yeller came home,
and cried when he got shot to death,
I was 6 then, and I got over it real quick when I saw a ambulance traveling about 80 MPH clip a dog that attempted to cross the road,
and sent it spinning about a hundred yards up the road on its side.
He was deader than a hammer, but I didn't whine about the ambulance driver hitting the dog.
The guy that witnessed the carnage needs to get a grip and realize that as long as airplanes fly, there will be casualties, human and wildlife, and not make such a fuss about nothing.
I am just glad that the aviator was not injured or killed That is the MOST important thing.