Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun May 10, 2026 3:52 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:50 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
So, what is being done with that 109? I remember seeing info and pics of it before a long time ago.... has anyone bought it? Or is it being restored where it is?

-David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Biak B-24's
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:48 pm
Posts: 842
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Thanks so much for posting the Natl Geographic illustrating the B-24's. If you look close it is evident that the tails on the B-24's have been purposely been crunched from the fuselage. The Feb 9, 1948 issue of Life magazine has a full page photo of scads of A-20's and P-38's on Biak as well. As I commneted in my original note there were 3 contiguous airfields on Biak (Sorido, Boroke and Mokmer). Sorido airfield is now a naval barracks area, Boroke is an abandoned Dutch Airbase (modern hangers, quonset huts etc + a very derelict Hawker Hunter) and Mokmer is the Intl Airport with a 10K+ ft runway. Although Biak is located at the very eastern end of Indonesia access was easy in the 1990's. Garuda Airlines had a daily flight from LAX to Bali with fueling stops at HNL and Biak. Although the DC-10 was at capacity I was the ONLY passenger to deplane at Biak and again the only passenger to board on the return trip to LAX!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
You're welcome on the NatGeo photo. I wanted my own copy for well over thirty years but had no idea of what issue it was in. Finally a friend let me go through his complete collection of post-WWII issues and we found it. It was like a holy grail discovery to me. (Weird, I know :roll: )

For the story of the Indian B-24 refurbishment, try reading this link: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Histo ... rator.html

Scott


Last edited by Second Air Force on Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:32 pm
Posts: 328
Second Air Force wrote:

For the story of the Indian B-24 refurbishment, try reading this link: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Histo ... rator.html

Scott


B-25's and Lancs were unsuitable, but they went for B-24's? I wish :psyduck: worked on here because seriously, wow. Considering the US couldn't get rid of B-24's fast enough after the war was over you'd think that'd be a sign.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 4:21 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
gale_dono wrote:
Second Air Force wrote:

For the story of the Indian B-24 refurbishment, try reading this link: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Histo ... rator.html

Scott


B-25's and Lancs were unsuitable, but they went for B-24's? I wish :psyduck: worked on here because seriously, wow. Considering the US couldn't get rid of B-24's fast enough after the war was over you'd think that'd be a sign.


I wonder if the fact that the Liberators were essentially "free" to the IAF is the real reason that they didn't go with the Lanc or B-25. That and the fact that Libs and the engines were overhauled at RAF stations in India during the war may have been deciding factors since there were folks in-country with some experience maintaining them. Kind of a neat story of ingenuity and inventiveness, and they did use the aircraft hard for quite a long time, so it seems to have worked out well for the IAF. Thanks to them we have many more survivors today than we otherwise would have!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:32 pm
Posts: 328
I must not have noticed the "free" part ^^''


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:30 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
i own 1 of the pilot seats of an india based b-24 that was initially bought by a very reputable aviation memorabila dealer, he got it from the late great dave tallichete. i had it restored & it's gorgeous!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 8:48 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: VT
tom d. friedman wrote:
i own 1 of the pilot seats of an india based b-24 that was initially bought by a very reputable aviation memorabila dealer, he got it from the late great dave tallichete. i had it restored & it's gorgeous!!


What no pics???

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:52 am
Posts: 134
Location: Canada, eh
daveymac82c wrote:
For instance, it is very difficult to find information on Lancaster KB999's current condition/location.
Cheers,

David


some on-line info on KB999 here :
http://www.lancastermuseum.ca/lancavro.html#indexkb999

I'm pretty sure it is gone as scrap metal by now. It would have been fairly accessible on the shore of Hudson's Bay.

_________________
Bill Walker
Canadian Military Aircraft Serials
www.ody.ca/~bwalker/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:47 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
Hey Bill,

Thanks for the link. As it turns out a lot of the info on KB999 is inaccurate. It actually crashed about 70 miles west of the shores of Hudson Bay in an un-named lake. Technically it's located in the southern part of Nunavut.

I spoke with the heritage minister for Nunavut and he was aware of the airplane and has an associate that knows of its exact location, but never mentioned the condition.

I kept digging and eventually learned that the salvage rights belonged to the Western Canada Aviation Museum. The did a survey of the crash location a number of years ago and determined that due to the condition of the airframe (or what was left of it), that any sort of recovery expedition would be too costly for what reminents they would actually be able to being back.

It's quite a sad end to an airplane that didn't look to be too badly damaged after the accident.

So that was about 8 months of searching, calling government offices, military offices, trying to get crash reports from the national archives, etc...

Cheers,

David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Biak B-24's
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:11 pm
Posts: 360
Location: Ohio
jdvoss wrote:
The Feb 9, 1948 issue of Life magazine has a full page photo of scads of A-20's and P-38's on Biak as well.


Is there just one picture of P-38's? Is there a story to go with it?

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:50 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Let's see if this works...

Image


Image


Image


Image

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 9:10 am
Posts: 165
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire, UK
daveymac82c wrote:
Hey Bill,

Thanks for the link. As it turns out a lot of the info on KB999 is inaccurate. It actually crashed about 70 miles west of the shores of Hudson Bay in an un-named lake. Technically it's located in the southern part of Nunavut.

I spoke with the heritage minister for Nunavut and he was aware of the airplane and has an associate that knows of its exact location, but never mentioned the condition.

I kept digging and eventually learned that the salvage rights belonged to the Western Canada Aviation Museum. The did a survey of the crash location a number of years ago and determined that due to the condition of the airframe (or what was left of it), that any sort of recovery expedition would be too costly for what reminents they would actually be able to being back.

It's quite a sad end to an airplane that didn't look to be too badly damaged after the accident.

So that was about 8 months of searching, calling government offices, military offices, trying to get crash reports from the national archives, etc...

Cheers,

David


I don't get it.... it was fairly intact in the lake, what would have caused it to become so badly damaged that it wouldn't be usable?

The ice wouldn't have done it, at worst it would have crushed the fuselage, but that's assuming there's nothing but air in there. You only have to look at the Dyke Lake B17 to see ice damage; or failing that the Greenland B17's under a couple of hundred feet.

For a Lanc in similar conditions There's the remains of DV202 in the lake near Peenemunde, and I've seen pictures of it iced over.

Are the Western Canada Aviation Museum the same organisation that have the salvage rights for the Avro York?

Regards

Ric


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:22 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Australia
Ric,

I think in this case it has been suggested the airframe has been rolled around, torn apart and crushed by the ice flows forming on, and floating around it in the lake, not just a thin layer of ice, or pack snow. It would be interesting to see images of the remains to confirm the stories about its condition.

not sure what the google earth coverage is in that area?

regards

Mark Pilkington

_________________
20th Century - The Age of Manned Flight
"from Wrights to Armstrong in 66 years -WOW!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 9:10 am
Posts: 165
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire, UK
I realise this Mark, I just don't understand how... if there's water inside the aircraft that would freeze as well, which wouldn't move it that much. It may have shifted into deeper water, but I can't see it being crushed.

If 300 odd feet of ice won't crush a set of B17 wings, then I doubt a lake barely deep enough to submerge a Lancaster in would have fully crushed that.

I for one would love to see confirmation of this aircrafts condition... even if it is in pieces.

Ric


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 118 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group