Oh yeah, I forgot to include an additional detail in the story... the flight in question takes place after dark, around 10pm, in the fall. So sightseeing really isn't an issue (at least for the "out" leg).
I guess it's safe to assume that high-altitude flying is really only efficient for longer duration flights, huh? Like from Portland to Denver, for example? I know that commercial jets will climb to 30k feet just to go from here (Dallas) to Houston. They reach altitude just in time to start descending! That always seemed silly to me as I couldn't see how the fuel used to climb like that was any less than what you'd burn by staying at a lower altitude for such a short distance?
Back to my story though... if flying IFR at night, over mountains, is it still okay to stay at lower altitudes? I know it's more comfortable, but I think I'd be inclined to make sure I had a cushion above even the tallest object I'd likely encounter. In this case, I'd probably want to fly at 15k feet between take-off and approach (altitude being a pilot's friend)
I confess to never being a licensed pilot though, much less IFR certified. So that's why I'm asking. And I do appreciate all the comments and help!
Fred B.