Folks, it's the internet, just like it's started by a (probably) second string newsperson looking to fill some space one day.
It's interesting
just for discussion, and has thrown up some interesting documented other info; (Silverplate, Mike13 and APG85's comments) so I reckon it's been worth it. Personally, I don't believe it, but I'm not attacking the guy.
Bill Greenwood wrote:
Other people have verified that there was a USMC unit there just as he said, also that there were white Lancs in the Pacific.
As far as I'm aware, the Tiger Force Lancasters (white ones) were
going to be in the Pacific but never were because of the atomic bombs.
There were a) never any Lancs in that area of the Pacific pre August '45; b) nor white ones, and c) Lancasters are significantly smaller than a B-29. D) He never stated 'Lancaster' either.
As I said before, it's probably a genuine mistake that's grown. Understandably supported by his family, it doesn't make his recollection 'accurate'. People's (including USMC) aircraft recognition wasn't any better than than it often is now!
And the acid test for thse going 'well it
coulda...' and the right to free speech; remember just because something
could have happened, doesn't mean it
did.
PS: I've never seen
Pearl Harbor, I'm just sitting on a castor chair and many of us have been studying the air war for multiple times longer than it actually lasted.
Just a few thoughts.