Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 4:28 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Has anyone done this?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:42 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:38 am
Posts: 1425
Location: LONE JACK Mo.
I was on YouTube, and happened to see some vids on tail-wheel warbirds that couldn't quite see well over their noses, and as you would guess, ran into something that didn't say I'm sorry.
My thoughts ran to this...with our technology nowdays, we have remote cameras in out cars, to keep us from running over Jounior's bicycle in the driveway...Has anyone ever installed a remote camera on their warbird/spamcan taildragger, to at least help with the visuals in taxi-ing? Or should I patent a devise?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 261
Location: Midwest
GARY HILTON wrote:
Has anyone ever installed a remote camera on their warbird/spamcan taildragger, to at least help with the visuals in taxi-ing? Or should I patent a devise?



Pat Holloran in Firecracker did just that. I believe there is a lipstick camera under chin.

http://www.airventure.org/2007/news/070 ... acker.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:51 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:38 am
Posts: 1425
Location: LONE JACK Mo.
Good for them! I know it's added luggage on weight critical aircraft, but now everything is so compact, it seems its usefullness would override its cost in weight


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 261
Location: Midwest
I agree the weight gain on even the lightest of general aviation aircraft would be negligible. The distraction would be a greater concern from my view. Perhaps it is no worse than an occasional glance in the rear view mirror while motoring down the highway, but I can imagine some getting so distracted they would fail to S turn or even look at their wing tips and the wipe off a tip on a gate post.....or worse, take off the other wing tip of a nearby $13M Citation. Like any other tailwheel airplane....keep your head in the game and you'll do OK.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:24 pm
Posts: 877
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYXd60D_kgQ

_________________
" excuse me stewardess I speak jive"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 pm
Posts: 656
Gary thats a great Idea, A whole system like that can be installed for very little and there would not even be a weight issue.you can go wireless with small monitor in panel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:02 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2347
Location: Minnesota
The one example that stands out in my memory is that the late Jim Wright had one mounted in his reproduction Hughes H-1, due to severe loss of visibility while on the ground. The camera was mounted just under the cowling and the feed was sent back to a small, hand held TV monitor in the cockpit that could be removed at will. On the H-1, it was almost a necessary addition since S turning wouldn’t provide any relief like it does in most tail draggers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 962
Location: my home planet is EARTH!
...of course :D

_________________
EVERYTHING that CAN fly should be ALLOWED to FLY!
IWO JIMA'S best narative..."GOD ISN'T HERE"
http://www.amazon.com/God-Isnt-Here-Ame ... 0976154706


P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.

S: Took hammer away from midget.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:36 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:38 am
Posts: 1425
Location: LONE JACK Mo.
It's now obvious that I can't patent the concept, I had just never heard of anyone doing this....Maybe even adding the ground collision avoidance warning to it as well...........just a thought......I still remember watching the Moon Spillers Mustang eating the tail off the Beech 18 years ago at the Topeka, Ks airshow....things that really make you wince!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:26 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
I believe Kevin Eldridge has one in his Nemesis NXT also.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:07 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
We discussing this on the L-39s and Mi-24 in the Gun Camera port not just for extra FOV, but for cool videos too like the 262 video. It would be nice to have a belly and/or tail camera on the R4D though, make for some good video and extra set of eyes in the cockpit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:54 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2672
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
GARY HILTON wrote:
I still remember watching the Moon Spillers Mustang eating the tail off the Beech 18 years ago at the Topeka, Ks airshow....things that really make you wince!


Didn't a TBF/TBM Avenger taxi up on a small homebuilt a couple of years ago and kill the passenger with the prop? :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:24 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
One year at Oshkosh there was a super tricked out Stearman. It had a chromed 450, three bladed prop, enclosed cockpit, and every option you could possibly put on a Stearman. Autopilot, color radar, etc. It had about 30 coats of red lacquer, and gold leaf paint everywhere including the striping and the control stick. It had a periscoping camera with color t.v. screen in the cockpit so you could see in any direction, not only for forward taxiing but also to check behind you before doing a run-up.
A few years later it was for sale for $500k and later reduced to $325K.
Reminded me of the proverb " A fool and their money are soon parted." :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group