Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:22 am
Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:20 am
Jack Cook wrote:from avweb today.....
Airshow pilot Patty Wagstaff (or her representative) will appear in court in Oshkosh on Sept. 2 to face two charges relating to the incident on a runway at Wittman Regional Airport July 31. According to court records, Wagstaff is charged with first offense drunken driving and failure to submit to a sobriety test. If the second charge is proven, then it amounts to an automatic conviction on the first. Wagstaff has denied she was impaired by alcohol on that night but does admit to taking a wrong turn and ending up on the runway.
In a statement to AVweb earlier this week, Wagstaff mentioned the lack of physical proof of impairment. "I do deny the allegations," she told AVweb. " And, I did not do a breath test, a blood test or a field sobriety test." EAA security personnel first stopped Wagstaff and three others in her vehicle on the runway and called Winnebago County Sheriffs, who took Wagstaff into custody.
and from http://rvnewsletter.blogspot.com/
I don't know why I've suddenly become interested in this story, but I am. AvWeb did not update the story today (or at least hasn't yet) as the editor said they would today. So I did something highly unusual -- I picked up the phone and called the Winnebago County District Attorney. No luck. I got voicemail.
Kansas.com reports Wagstaff is still scheduled to perform there this week.
Wagstaff says she wasn't given a test at the scene of the alleged incident in Oshkosh. But what wasn't clear is if she was asked to take one, but refused. If it's the latter, that has some significant consequences for pilots.
Under Part 61, she can have her pilot's certificate suspended.
Update - The DA's office never called me back (Wisconsin stateworkers, you know.) But AvWeb confirms my suspicions. The reason Wagstaff says she wasn't given a sobriety test is because she refused a sobriety test.
Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:23 am
Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:56 am
Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:13 am
CAPFlyer wrote:The big issue here is that several witnesses said that the incident was non-friendly (if not hostile) from both the security and law enforcement side.
Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:19 am
Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:00 pm
Thu Aug 14, 2008 3:02 pm
Thu Aug 14, 2008 3:37 pm
Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:07 pm
Want to point us to that article? None of the ones I read had anything as inflammatory an accusation as that
Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:50 pm
Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:32 pm
Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:50 pm
Jack Cook wrote:How does all that affect your pilots license???
Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:43 pm
mustangdriver wrote:Ummm WTF? Why on earth should it be civil? You drove drunk down an active runway, off of the end, fish tailing and almost clipping several warbirds, and PEOPLE. That is the article I read. In my book they should have been anything but civil.
Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:18 pm