Sounds like you're fortunate enough to not only afford the insurance, but you need it. Were I in the same situation, I'd want it & could affors it. The little shops, tho, are what I see as having the biggest problem. The going a/c shop rent in these parts is $60ish p/h. (Of course, I think the auto guys are bumping $100 p/h.) I mean the 1 man shows, like me, who pretty much works on the locals at their airport with maybe a few outsiders. Mostly SE recips that fly maybe 30 hours a year. It's bad enough you can't even pay rent off it, much less eat & then a bunch of non-knowing folks demand insurance coverage or no work. A friend of mine at another airport was asked a couple of years ago about working on the CAP C172. Say, a $1500 Annual Insp., but before doing it he'd have to have shop insurance. Yeahm sure, $10K in insurance to gross $1500, clear maybe half that. Such a deal. About that cabinet door. I don't suppose the $200 locally made one would be certified would it?
Here's a situation I 'avoided' last week. There was a C182 stopped at the FBO for fuel. The guy came back in & asked if we had a GPU. Well, no, the FBO doesn't but I do, so I said 'no'. Mine's one of those big ol' Hobart tug/GPU's that burns about 10 gallons of fuel just getting to the a/c & starting it. Anyone, usually turbines who I will use it on if I have to, get hit for $100 or more just to plug it in. Bear in mind now, IF there's a glitch & IT fries the electrical system (hey, it CAN happen!), I'm out $5K - $10K on insurance, or whatever it takes to repair it if less than that. (Yes, the C182 was a later 24V system.) Then, he asked about jump starting. I then told him I had no way of doing so without risking my personal vehicles' charging systems & that it would take 2 cars anyway. He went to another hangar where an A&P/IA friend of mine was working on his own a/c (the L-6 I posted a pic of a while back). He does no commercial work & also has no insurance. He brought a battery charger over & charged the battery while the guy ate lunch. OK, so he asked me for a GPU, but come to find out why the battery was weak, the alternator died enroute & he wanted to make it home. Hmm. So, maybe my GPU fried his charging system had I started him? He told me he had a weak battery. Now, last time I checked a 182 Equipment List, the alternator is required for flight. Legally, it's either gotta be operating or requires a Ferry Permit to get home with it inop. Let's say I got tied up in that, the guy crashed & his alternator was found defective & contributed to or even caused the crash. (This guy's insurance, like most, if not all insurance, only covers airworthy airplanes & without a Ferry Permit or operating alternator, it's not airworthy. No insurance coverage now.) Not in the FAA's eyes, but a lawyer's eyes, I'm now out $5K for my $100 to GPU the guy or $60 for charging his battery, but I 'let' him go with an unairworthy airplane. After all, he's just a pilot & I, as a mechanic, should have known better....... Risk of liability makes one think........... A couple of years ago, on a Sunday afternoon, there was a new model C182 landed & the NW fairing came apart. That flimsy ABS they use. 2 big sections were still held on at the axle bolt. I looked at it, told the pilot what it would cost for me to do it properly. It was a rental & he couldn't reach the owner, so I told him HE could just cut what's left & probably be OK. I loaned him my snips, he trimmed the pieces & left. The following day, I got a call from his FSDO, in MEM, IIRC. Come to find out, it was a hard landing, at some point & the firewall was buckled. OK, so what did I have to do with it? The bimbo from the FSDO informed me that I didn't make a logbook entry or revise the W&B/EL for the removal of the fairing. I informed her I didn't touch it. I ended up filling out some statement to that effect & a couple of days later she called me & said the pilot had confirmed my statement & no enforcement action on me would follow! Thanks. No, sometimes it just ain't worth it!
tinbender2 wrote:
Well,
You all have made some very good points. Perhaps I should clarify some of mine.
I feel liability insurance is mandatory for me, because my customers will be mainly bizjet owners, and most will not let you work on their aircraft without it. I am extremely careful in my work, but I know I’m human and can make a mistake, and the price of parts for these aircraft is astronomical, as is loss of use of the aircraft, minor injury to a million dollar passenger, etc.
I am not pursuing the owners of light single- and twin-engine piston aircraft as clients. As nice as those folks are, IME, most want the cheapest work they can find, including one-eye annuals and pencil-whipping SB/ADs. They seem to be the biggest maintenance liability risk with the least profit. I know guys that are working these type aircraft. They are barely surviving, and have their names all over the logbooks of thrashed airframes being flown by pilots that barely fly 50 hrs a year. Personally, if I was working these aircraft, I’d want liability insurance even if I didn’t have any assets. Say a financially secure pilot crashes and injures his wealthy pax. I would think the pilot would do everything he could to shift blame for the accident onto someone else,(like his mechanic) solely to protect his assets. Do you really want to spend the rest of your life with a massive financial judgement against you? With collections jackals trying to take anything of value you may have in the future?:evil:
My cost for insurance will be rolled into my shop rate. And I still believe I can turn a healthy profit and beat the typical FBO rate by 25% or more. I specialize in structures and airframe mods, and there is a massive amount of work available. My plate currently has nine commuter airliners needing serious corrosion repairs and 18 service kits to install, a King Air wanting 3 major Raisbeck mods, and a King Air mothership conversion that will be controlling UAVs in the sandbox. I recently declined a fleet of CRJs needing corrosion repair, and a pile of VLJs needing airframe mods. And this is without even looking for customers.
If you want to make money in aircraft maintenance, go after the owners that already have a healthy budget set aside for aircraft maintenance. $35-$50/hr ain’t hard to get if you’re good.
I am still investigating the merits of leasing all my tools & equipment to my corporation. As others have said, having no physical company assets should discourage the legal eagles from attacking. There may be some negative tax issues though.
In regards to defending yourself when you are not at fault. I cannot recall any lawsuit in the past ten years that went the full distance. They were all settled out of court, because it was considerably cheaper than mounting a full scale legal defense. And you can never be sure a jury has even the minimal intelligence necessary to see blatant right from wrong. When I spent 2 weeks in a jury pool, those selected for trials seemed to be the least educated/most easily persuaded folks of the group. The Piper case was beyond bizarre. Those jurors must have been smoking crack.
Perhaps I bashed lawyers a bit too hard, but my sentiments are based on my personal experiences...here’s a few more...
I’ve seen an FBO pay for line service damage they didn’t cause, and I had proof the damage happened elsewhere (steel doesn’t heavily rust overnight in the desert). But when the aircraft owner threatened to sue, the FBO took the path of least expense, and paid for the repair.
Another lawsuit I’m close to concerns a bizjet damaged by a freak storm. No person or manmade object touched the aircraft. Damage/loss of use is estimated at $600,000. Pilot tried to cover his butt by saying he called the FBO and ordered the aircraft be hangared before the storm. Complete BS, but he’s trying to save his job and save his company from paying out. I’m sure it will get settled out of court with the FBO paying for some of the damage.
I have seen shops slowly evolve over the past 20 years to the point they won’t overhaul anything. Landing gear, engines, props, etc., all because of potential liability. Even turbine fuel nozzles that I used to flow check 5 years ago, are now sent out to a specialty shop.
Speaking of aircraft cabinets...
Just got a quote today for replacing a small faux wood door on a refreshment stand (King Air 200). It had a small chip in it, and no self-respecting millionaire would even think of flying in an aircraft in such horrible disrepair...
$5,200.00
I’m sure a local cabinet shop could make an identical one for under $200, but most owners would demand the $5200 one, if you are the one paying for it.
