Forgotten Field wrote:
This being an election year, I think it highly possible to get somebody to set up a hearing on it. Actually, a simple call to Waste Fraud and Abuse hotlines might get something going.
I think adding any more bureaucracy into the equation is the worst possible solution. Politicians don't give a hoot about an A-25. All they will do is add another layer of bureaucracy and probably find some pen pushing jerk make everyone at the museums life more difficult and inefficient. It is most likely that any damage that was made will be repaired by the museum and we can all go on with our lives. The best solution in my opinion would be for the NMUSAF to own up to the situation and release a public statement about it. I doubt that the general in charge of the museum or the management staff said "by the way I don't care how you transport that aircraft, chop it in half if you want to but just get it here."
Most likely it was some poor decisions by some worker bees. It is VERY easy to damage an aircraft when disassembling and transporting an aircraft. I know because I have done it. That is why it is important that they use very experienced people to lead a recovery project like this.
Hopefully a lesson has been learned, but we certainly will never know if we hear nothing from the NMUSAF.
Ryan