Warbird Information Exchange

According to Wikipedia:



Were these wing problems? Did the C-97's have the same corrosion issues or were they better because of different heat treating methods post war?

Also did only some of the B-50's have the two jet engines outboard?

Thanks!

A few years ago I was researching the B-50 fleet and why so few remain. The last unit to be equipped with them (WB or RB-50s if I recall) based in Japan scrapped them on-site rather than risk ferrying them to the CONUS. The reason given was advanced corrosion in the wing structure. I'd imagine there was a learning curve with the use of advanced alloys in the B-50--there was a lot of 75ST aluminum in the wings, a breakthrough of sorts in aircraft construction at the time.

Only the KB-50J and K got the jet pods, and that was only to up the performance for refueling the new jets coming on-line at the time.

Scott

Thanks Scott that is interesting information.

.

75ST (later 7075) is prone to stress corrosion cracking and is no longer commonly used on aircraft in fatigue sensitive assemblies.

<EDIT> To clarify, the later 4-digit tempers are OK.

I don't think that the KC-97s ever had the same corrosion problems that finally grounded the KB-50Js in 1965. I believe that the jet engines removed from many of the KB-50Js ended up on the KC-97Ls which flew into 1978.

I wish there was a B-50 flying today. But that is never gonna happen.

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com

Me, TOO, Nathan. But I will settle for getting the C-97 back in the air to hear those R-4360's in action again!

Four R-4360's at full power on take off? Oh, yeah!!

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com

B-50 wings were interchangable with KC-97 wings. C-97 s/n 48-399 had a wing burn off in a ground accident and the wing was replaced with a B-50 wing. My dad flew it for several years in the Minnesota Air Guard.

Boeing still uses lots of that stuff in aircraft.

How many structuaral parts from the KC-97 can be used on the B-29? I've often wondered if a few old -97 airframes could help keep Fifi flying.

SN

Here's a couple stills from Tora! Tora! Tora! showing a B-50 minus outer engines and wings in the background:





Looks like they painted it blue to match the PBYs in the second shot.

_________________

All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)

Amazing, Chris!

I've watched that movie many times and now I have an excuse to watch it again. Are both of the aircraft out there on the apron B-50s, or is the one with the dark forward fuselage a C-97? Seeing the airplane being dismantled seems to verify the story of scrapping them on-site at the time they were grounded due to structural problems.

Scott