Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 3:56 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:18 am
Posts: 42
Location: Mesquite,Texas
Anyone hear abot Perot starting an agressor squadron with MIG's at Alliance? A friend told me he say what he thought were MIG -27's or MIG-29's out there

_________________
Classic Cars and Vintage Warbirds perserve them don't destroy them


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:04 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2673
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
There's a gentleman in Delaware who has two MiG 21s and two MiG 23s based at New Castle County Airport near Wilmington (airport code ILG). Some people have WA-A-A-AY too much disposable income!

Dean the impoverished :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Posts: 171
Location: Dallas, TX
Could just team up with the Cold War Museum at Lancaster TX and get their 23 flying.

Bill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:42 pm 
Offline
Taylorcraft Racing

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:29 pm
Posts: 832
Location: Amorica
The plan is to use ex-CAF CF-5s.

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 4:37 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
AirJimL2 wrote:
The plan is to use ex-CAF CF-5s.

Jim


The Perot operation with CF-5s (my understanding is that they were Norwegian F-5s...) is a lead-in fighter training program designed to suncontract for the USAF.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 259
Location: Addison, Texas
Ztex posted this pic in the airports to avoid thread.

So this is the Perot aggressors?

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 8:01 pm 
Offline
Taylorcraft Racing

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:29 pm
Posts: 832
Location: Amorica
Randy Haskin wrote:
The Perot operation with CF-5s (my understanding is that they were Norwegian F-5s...) is a lead-in fighter training program designed to suncontract for the USAF.


Randy,

At least some, if not all of the aircraft, are ex-CAF. These were the airplanes the CAF upgraded with state of the art avionics and they were then almost immediately retired. The CF-116s were moved from Mountainview last year and are at Northrop Grumman for IRAN. Three or four have been sold to private owners as warbirds.

As for what exactly the program is, I'm sure you know more then me, but I understood it was for lead-in training for UAE pilots.

Jim

P.S.: Cripes - I'm pretty sure those are real US military aggressors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 8:57 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
The UAE contract was how ATSI got started.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:30 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
AirJimL2 wrote:
As for what exactly the program is, I'm sure you know more then me, but I understood it was for lead-in training for UAE pilots.


The actual genesis behind the program was the post 9/11 load of foreign students who flooded the USAF's fighter lead-in program. Most of these spots are given to countries who buy US equipment, or they're given away as military aid -- it used to be called the "MAP" or "Military Assistance Program", although today in an interesting bit of quasi-Orwellian newspeak the program is called the "Security Assistance Program."

Anyhow, these students turned out to be a drag on the normal student training flow in the USAF program. It was a bad deal for both the US and foreign students -- the foreign students generally needed a little more assistance, which sometimes meant extra sorties. The problem is that sorties are a finite resource, and the more allocated to foreign students the less can be allocated to US students.

So, a couple of retired USAF instructors pitched the idea to create a private fighter lead-in squadron to take the burden of the foreign students.

Since Rick brought up ATSI, the Perot guys have made every effort to do things the "right" way, unlike ATSI. They've had to work with the FAA very closely throughout the project, as they are doing lots of unusual things -- being able to have civilians instruct foreign nationals how to dogfight using ex-foreign fighters while being able to have 'hot' MOAs for non-military traffic. ATSI apparently got into some trouble because they didn't bother to include the FAA in their plans and operated in a rather gray-area.

So...the point of this is that the UAE has some of these lead in training slots allocated as part of their purchase of the Block 60 F-16, and they were aiming to be the first customer for the Alliance guys.

The last I had any contact or information with those guys was 2006, so things may have changed since then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:31 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Cripes A Mighty wrote:
So this is the Perot aggressors?

Image


Those look like plain old vanilla Navy F-5 aggressors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 7:38 am 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
The F-5's I posted are Navy birds.

I have not heard about the Perot angle to this Alliance training deal. There has been some buzz on the foreign pilot training but no mention of airplanes, and the "news" paper talked like this was a USAF deal not private.

There has been no sign of any airframes at the airport.

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 8:06 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
ATAC looks like they will be spooling up on some additional contracts. They will be using single seat aircraft though.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 293 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group