Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 3:28 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Lanc S for Sugar
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:04 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Avro Lancaster S for Sugar.

Survives today, in the Bomber Command Hall at the RAF Museum.

Image

The period caption reads 'S for Sugar - a grand old lady.

AVM Wrigley, S/L Winter, Duke of Gloucester, W/C Scott.'

(That's Air Vice Marshal Henry Neilson Wrigley, CBE, DFC (RAAF) Squadron Leader Winter, His Royal Highness the Duke of Gloucester, Wing Commander Scott.)

The quote on the fuselage side is by a chap called Herman Goering, also known as 'Meyer'... ;)

From an album in the RAF Museum collection.

Quote:
Lancaster B I R5868 "S-Sugar"
The oldest surviving Lancaster flew 137 operations, originally as "Q-Queenie" with No. 83 Squadron RAF from RAF Scampton and then as "S-Sugar" with No. 463 and No. 467 RAAF Squadrons from RAF Waddington. This aircraft was the first RAF heavy bomber aircraft to complete 100 operations (going on to fly 137 sorties[15]) and is now on display at the RAF Museum, Hendon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Lancaster

http://youtube.com/watch?v=QEkBu5lDfAo&feature=related

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:55 am 
Offline
Newly minted Mustang Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 1446
Location: Everywhere
two weeks ago

jimh
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:10 pm
Posts: 205
Location: US of A
The best is: "No Enemy Plane Will Fly Over The Reich Territory" Herman Goering

They had to begin a useless war just to satisfy their egos and mental disturbances (Goering was extremely egocentric, selfish and a coward in the end) and for what? It's much of what other dictators are doing today (take Hugo Chavez for example).

Mind everyone, but it's most satisfying when you see these aircrafts, the crew that piloted them and feel proud knowing that THEY DID the job of defeating who was against freedom and liberty. I hope that future generations never forget this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:43 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3258
Location: New York
Sean Curtiss wrote:
The best is: "No Enemy Plane Will Fly Over The Reich Territory" Herman Goering

They had to begin a useless war just to satisfy their egos and mental disturbances (Goering was extremely egocentric, selfish and a coward in the end) and for what? It's much of what other dictators are doing today (take Hugo Chavez for example).

Mind everyone, but it's most satisfying when you see these aircrafts, the crew that piloted them and feel proud knowing that THEY DID the job of defeating who was against freedom and liberty. I hope that future generations never forget this.


I hope future generations have a more realistic notion of why wars start. It goes well beyond egotism and mental illness, and even freedom and liberty.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:10 pm
Posts: 205
Location: US of A
k5083 wrote:
I hope future generations have a more realistic notion of why wars start. It goes well beyond egotism and mental illness, and even freedom and liberty.

We could debate this subject endlessly, but I can't disagree on what you wrote.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 560
Location: Croydonia
Here's some I prepared earlier:

Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I am dying to go there and see this awesome aircraft eventually.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:52 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Driver...make your trip to Hendon the same time you go to Duxford. Both are awesome. :twisted:

Mudge the merciless

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:23 am
Posts: 321
[quote="Mudge"]Driver...make your trip to Hendon the same time you go to Duxford. Both are awesome. :twisted:

Well, it would be CRIMINAL to miss the Fleet Air Arm Museum at Yeovilton, Somerset.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3258
Location: New York
Glyn wrote:
Mudge wrote:
Driver...make your trip to Hendon the same time you go to Duxford. Both are awesome. :twisted:

Well, it would be CRIMINAL to miss the Fleet Air Arm Museum at Yeovilton, Somerset.


I have committed that crime! In my defense, Yeovilton is a bit harder to get to from the London area where most vacationers stay. I do intend make amends next visit to the UK. From photos I've seen, though, it appears that Yeovilton is a worthy rival to the worst US museums in terms of dark, crowded, and generally unfavorable viewing conditions for the aircraft.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:27 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Yeovilton pictures, please. Well...maybe not. I just watched the video and the place does, in fact, look quite dreary and uninviting. No offense intended. Just my observation.

Mudge the intrigued :shock:

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:41 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3258
Location: New York
You're quite right Mudge. I do have a few of a friend's that I could post, though.

Besides the dreariness, I wish museums that display naval aircraft would resist the temptation to fold the wings and pack them tighter than on a carrier hangar deck!

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:12 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
How did we get from a W.W.II photo of a Lancaster to the FAA Museum? :shock:

Well, whatever. I have no professional connection to any of the museums, but I would say that while the RAF Museum (a magnificent collection (currently) poorly managed and curated) does the least with the most, the Fleet Air Arm Museum at Yeovilton probably does the most with the least cash. It's remained near the top of my personal museum rating due to their ability to incorporate innovation within and around their displays, a intriguing collection of oddities and professional and helpful staff. They have on several occasions set the benchmark with world standard displays appearing there for the first time in the UK (the Concorde display, 'Leading Edge', the Corsair conservation exercise, and 'Carrier' interactive.) despite less resources than most other comparable museums.

Yes, it's as long way (in British terms) from anywhere else. Yes, it's dark in many areas. But it's d@mn good.

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 800
Location: Vancouver BC
Was S Sugar ever repainted post-war service, or is she still in her last original coat of paint?

I remember seeing her back in 1984, and thinking how big it seemed; until I stood under the Vulcan, that is, and marveled at the expanse of aircraft above me in all directions....


greg v.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:30 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
Another question regarding the Lanc, and GregV I hope I don't get in the way of people answering your question....

But,

I've always noticed the big black bump on the bottom of the Lancaster's fuselage just aft the bombay, but never really understood what it housed. Can someone explain to me it's purpose? Electronics? Nav Aids?

And how come they chose to never put a belly turret in that position? Was it because night raids didn't require too much protection from underneath?

Cheers,

David McIntosh


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 90 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group