Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 03, 2026 6:03 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:59 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
JDK wrote:
I'm talking to restorers building a static DH Mosquito in airworthy and original standards, and we should all be aware of Glynn Powell's work in NZ building new-wood Mosquitoes to fly. (I'm also supporting a project to build a 1914 biplane trainer - of wood, but that's another story.)


Not to get too far off topic, JDK, but how many Mossie's is Glynn planning on making? I'm familiar with the well publicized Jerry Yagen plane, but I haven't heard of any other plans after that one. Are you at liberty to elaborate?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:18 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:06 am
Posts: 1059
Location: Virginia
Also from down-under, a flying replica of Kingsford Smith's Fokker Trimotor, with tube fuselage and wood wing, built in the 1980s (?), 65 ft. span, with three Jacobs engines:

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1216483/L/

I believe that it no longer flies after an undercarriage collapse, but is on static display somewhere?




-

_________________
http://www.biplanerides1.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:45 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
warbird1 wrote:
Not to get too far off topic, JDK, but how many Mossie's is Glynn planning on making? I'm familiar with the well publicized Jerry Yagen plane, but I haven't heard of any other plans after that one. Are you at liberty to elaborate?

I know no more than what's public knowledge, and my rather vague memory. My understanding is probably two airworthy, including the Yagen machine, plus the already delivered static fuselage (to Canada) and maybe more. Better informed people may be able to clarify.
Baldeagle wrote:
Also from down-under, a flying replica of Kingsford Smith's Fokker Trimotor, with tube fuselage and wood wing, built in the 1980s (?), 65 ft. span, with three Jacobs engines. I believe that it no longer flies after an undercarriage collapse, but is on static display somewhere?

Smithy's original 'bus' is on display at Brisbane Airport. The replica was hangared after damage, but the latest IIRC was it's been taken over by HARS, with a view to rebuild to fly, which would be great.

http://www.hars.org.au/

http://www.hars.org.au/news_previous.php#

(Scroll down to near the bottom where the headline is as below:)

Quote:
'Old Bus' In HARS Care

The well-known Fokker F.VIIB-3m 'Southern Cross' replica which was built at Murray Bridge in South Australia as a bicentenial project in 1988 is to be gifted by the South Australian Government to HARS, after a gruelling 'expression of interest' period starting June 2003 in which our Society competed with three other organisations for the privelege and responsibility.
...
Repairs will be extensive, involving two new engines (one of which is being donated), Two new props, new strengthened undercarriage, three metres of wing (wood already being sourced) and crack testing for the steel tube fuselage. But three important factors render the task less onerous than first appears:
1) A substantial insurance payout is included with the arrangements.
2) The proposed base at Murray Bridge provides with a hangar and a house at no charge, for the aircraft and our members.
3)Murray Bridge boasts fourteen new HARS members who were associated with the original construction of the replica in 1988 (including the man who founded and managed the project) - together with a further five new members of from RAAF Aircraft Research and Development Unit (ARDU) at Edinburgh, South Australia who were involved with the first test flights.

The project promises to bring enormous satisfaction to many members and to increase our influence further afield in Australia and around the World. Once airworthy, the SA based Southern Cross will tour airshows and events around Australia, often joining (and being joined by) other aircraft of the HARS fleet.
...

gary
25 Feb 2004

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:45 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
a nobal effort, i'm sure flying volunteers are not scarce, i'd be writing my name to the participant list if the opportunity came up regardless, i'd take my chances. but i'm sure some $$$$ insurance faction is present, what are the terms of the policy?? this is ballsy stuff!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:29 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
warbird1 wrote:
Not to get too far off topic, JDK, but how many Mossie's is Glynn planning on making? I'm familiar with the well publicized Jerry Yagen plane, but I haven't heard of any other plans after that one.

I've been following Glynn's project of at least the past 10 years, for the past 5 or 6.
His dedication to building the moulds and emulating the original techniques...combined with
modern adhesives and his own innovation suggest he's in for the long haul. The static bird and Yagen
may have got him started, but I'm guessing he'd pump out as many ordered...unless there's
a "break the mould" clause when they're done.. :shock: :?

I was wondering a coupl'a years back what "exotic" adhesives he ran with...I was very
surprised to find he went "off the shelf" with the West System..IIRC...quite a nod to WS.. :wink:

For the newbies..
www.mossie.org/NZ2308.htm
Yagen..
www.mossie.org/KA114.htm
Avspec..
www.warbirdrestoration.co.nz

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:25 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
airnutz wrote:
warbird1 wrote:
Not to get too far off topic, JDK, but how many Mossie's is Glynn planning on making? I'm familiar with the well publicized Jerry Yagen plane, but I haven't heard of any other plans after that one.

I've been following Glynn's project of at least the past 10 years, for the past 5 or 6.


Yes, I've been following it for quite some time as well. So, who's plane is going next into the moulds after Yagen's, do you know?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:02 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
warbird1 wrote:
So, who's plane is going next into the moulds after Yagen's, do you know?

Nope W'1, I don't have a clue. There was quite a bit of chatter on the boards regarding
which hulks or statics needed fuses and who'd be next, but that's the web for you.. :)

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: carbon
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:43 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:37 pm
Posts: 1197
[quote="Bill Greenwood"]To me, building a WWII glider out of composites would be abut as attractive as putting an electric engine in a P-51.[/quote]


What?!!?!?!? And chop down the old growth forests to build a silly old glider. What would greenpeace or the friends of the forest say! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: CG-4A project
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:30 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Wheels up wrote:
The plywood in particular is of concern. There are all sorts of thickness used in that design. Waco used 3 ply 1/64" (that's .005" per veneer sheet! :shock: ), 5 ply 3/64" and on and on. Some of these sheets were special length/width combinations....12' long sheets or 6' widths. While this poses no issue for a static display, an airworthy version would be forced to step up the thicknesses and add many scarf splices. All adding weight, compromising the original design, and adding labor. You simply cannot special order plywood...especially mahogany.

I dunno how much of this detail affects the fellow involved with re-engineering the design to account for modern material availability, but remember...this bird will never get near carrying the 4000 pound maximum payload it was designed to haul operationally. I figure this gives them qute a bit of room to play with in the weight department, and true..they can use modern adhesives and composites where needed to augment the long term requirements of multiple "snatches" over time.

A 120 mph snatch sounds foreboding, but due to the flexibility of the DuPont towline the pull force was reduced to 7G...basically a bungee cord which would eventually springback smoothly toward the towbird.

The initial press release for this project is very exciting news. I wonder how far they are with the project. They must've
cut wood and started welding tube/or have an existing fuse frame ready. 1 year and 6mos for completion of build,
testing and perfecting the snatch training and transport to Europe...quite an ambitious plan
for a bird with..whut..70K pieces? I'm really looking forward to seeing their future project updates..

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Payload
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:16 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1664
Location: Baltimore MD
Weight is required in the glider. When you are flying with pilot and co-pilot, you need ballast just aft of the cockpit worth 4 men with equipment, or it don't quite fly right... According to the manual any way. Best load was 75 MM howitzer and ammo. It sat low to the deck and was just the right combo of weight density to make the glider fly well.

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 261
Location: Midwest
Quote:
A 120 mph snatch sounds foreboding, but due to the flexibility of the DuPont towline the pull force was reduced to 7G...basically a bungee cord which would eventually springback smoothly toward the towbird.


Snatching requires the use of a special C47 (or suitable towplane) and some special winching/braking equipment......
http://www.silentwingsmuseum.com/images/Web%20Content/WWII%20USAAF%20Glider%20Aerial%20Retrieval%20System.pdf

Perhaps this stuff still exists from C119(and others) snatching days. But who's going to modify their C47?
The above link is interesting...I hadn't realized they snatched two at a time!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Payload
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:16 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Forgotten Field wrote:
Weight is required in the glider. When you are flying with pilot and co-pilot, you need ballast just aft of the cockpit worth 4 men with equipment, or it don't quite fly right... According to the manual any way. Best load was 75 MM howitzer and ammo. It sat low to the deck and was just the right combo of weight density to make the glider fly well.

Yes..FF, I figured they flew with some sort of ballast during training in order to give
the pilots some sort of "feel" of what they were in for. This is a manual strictly for the CG-4A?

There is also a manual I've read about for the, "M-80 Glider Pick-up Mechanism",
I need to see f I can find.

There is another book ya'll might keep an eye out for in involving the folks who
developed the Pick-up system for the Army from their mail retrieval system. I don't have it yet..
All American Aviation, Inc. , "Air Pick-Up Handbook, Wilmington Delaware,
All American Aviation, 1947.

One of these days, I'd really love to spend some time at the Silent Wings Museum..long drive north tho..

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Last edited by airnutz on Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Manual
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:50 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1664
Location: Baltimore MD
I read it in the CG-4A manual. The CG-4A manual is the only one I have gotten to read. I don't know about the CG-5 or the CG-13.

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:53 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Wheels up wrote:
Quote:
A 120 mph snatch sounds foreboding, but due to the flexibility of the DuPont towline the pull force was reduced to 7G...basically a bungee cord which would eventually springback smoothly toward the towbird.


Snatching requires the use of a special C47 (or suitable towplane) and some special winching/braking equipment......
http://www.silentwingsmuseum.com/images/Web%20Content/WWII%20USAAF%20Glider%20Aerial%20Retrieval%20System.pdf

Perhaps this stuff still exists from C119(and others) snatching days. But who's going to modify their C47?
The above link is interesting...I hadn't realized they snatched two at a time!

Two or "more" at a time in a train, depending on load and whether they're flying in tandem with another
tow aircraft. You could return a bunch of "empties" pretty quickly.

Richard C. Du Pont of All American Aviation had the idea and developed the Glider "Snatch" by
modifying AAA's Mail Pick-up Appartus they'd had in use since 1937. Their first mod involved
changing from a steel boom to one made of ash. Using a Stinson SR-10C they were snatching a
Piper TG with DuPont piloting the glider. They broke the towline 3 times until..."Overnight the
engineers produced a new line made of undrawn nylon that had far superior elasticity".
(I guess you can do that when your family has a chemical plant tat invented the stuff.) :wink:
Tonight I'll excerpt a couple of paragraphs from the All American book.

By what I read of the original post, Pappas has no problem laying hands on a Gooney. :D
The first "heavy" to snatch a glider was the Douglas Dragon...hope this old link works..
www.pointvista.com/WW2GliderPilots/1stC ... lesDay.jpg

I've wondered in the past coupla years if one of the DuPont foundations would turn
loose funds if the CAF restored the B-23 if they restored with the snatch gear as well
and dedicated it to Richard DuPont's vision, innovation and ultimate sacrifice in WW2.
They wouldn't necessarily have to go the whole CG-4 route, They could demonstrate the
technique with smaller warbird training gliders.
Same for the Pappas project, I wonder if they've explored DuPont funding?

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Weight and Balance
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:45 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1664
Location: Baltimore MD
Interesting this discussion on weight and balance in a glider. From Wikipedia about the XCG-16:

Quote:
The ballast carried within the glider was not secured and slid causing a weight shift in the glider. The glider began to "porpoise" and the pilot was unable to gain control. The glider was released from the tow plane and began a flat spin downward. The order was given to jump, but the glider had gotten to low for a safe jump. The passengers jumped with several surviving. Richard Chichester du Pont, Special Assistant for the Glider Program, was killed when his parachute failed to completely open

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group