tom d. friedman wrote:
doraninefan's statement sums up the quandry of what all & who are involved in with preserving dying history. isn't there some body of international government relations that could come together as a cooperative ?? time is running out between the torch & the elements. as i've said the warbird movement has reared it's ugly side now more than ever. unscrupulous 3rd world government croneys over seeing illegal recoveries w/ $$$$ kick backs, smelter happy salvagers shipping history off to china. could the u.n. step in?? after all ww 2 was a collective worldwide effort between nations, & there must be away to responsibly preserve history without these 3rd world nations using their trump card of autonomous government.
Very interesting and valid questions. Although my first reaction is that adding layers of bureaucracy will make it more difficult to save anything. I also think it could lead to policies similar to the "rot in place" viewpoint of the USN, where every remote wreck will be given a nice stone marker with bronze plaque and we rely on the honor system to prevent anyone touching it or removing it piece by piece. Even worse, 100 years into the future, every visitor could be issued a metal detector to experience the few remains of a war relic 6 inches under the soil.
Most of what remains of the US Civil War relics were gathered up into museums and private collections--not left where they fell. Some of the "sacred" battlegrounds where history was to be preserved have been under threat from real estate development (Disney in VA) and will probably continue to be. This is just to illustrate that time marches on.