Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 3:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: My Gal Sal
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:24 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
Anyone have some recent pics? Website seems a bit out of date.

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:02 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5210
Location: Stratford, CT.
I know Im gonna get some flak for this.

They say there a memorial and that they feel that the bomber should be displayed as it came to rest on the ice cap. If they wanted to display it as it was, then they should have kept her the way she was and displayed her in a crash diorama scene.

Being myself, I say they start connecting the pieces together and make a flyer out of her. No reason why she cant be a flying memorial right?

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:11 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Warbird Kid wrote:
I know Im gonna get some flak for this.

They say there a memorial and that they feel that the bomber should be displayed as it came to rest on the ice cap. If they wanted to display it as it was, then they should have kept her the way she was and displayed her in a crash diorama scene.

Being myself, I say they start connecting the pieces together and make a flyer out of her. No reason why she cant be a flying memorial right?


She wasn't all tore up when she first belly landed. It wasn't until years later that high winds flipped her over crushed the nose, broke it's back and smashed her tail.

Not every warbird can be a flyer. Sometimes it's the plane that decides that and other times it's the owner.

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:32 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5210
Location: Stratford, CT.
Good Point.

But I still see an opening for her to be a moving, active museum. I think she would touch so many more lives if she were out on the road.

The volume of people seeing her from airport to airport verses her just being a display in several pieces. It seems that they have done an incredible job at putting her pieces back in complete condition.

I just think that she would be way more impressive in one piece. Even if she wasn’t a flyer.

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:12 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
The restoration was not to airworthy specs. She will never be a flyer without replacement of nearly everything that was done to her. They replaced so much original structure anyway...

I agree that it's a pity that she is not on display... considering so much effort was expended upon her recovery and reconditioning. What is the story behind the stall in her display anyway?

Cheers,
Richard

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:37 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Warbird Kid wrote:
Good Point.

But I still see an opening for her to be a moving, active museum. I think she would touch so many more lives if she were out on the road.

The volume of people seeing her from airport to airport verses her just being a display in several pieces. It seems that they have done an incredible job at putting her pieces back in complete condition.

I just think that she would be way more impressive in one piece. Even if she wasn’t a flyer.


I am one of the ones in favor of keeping her static. The E model of the B-17 is a rare variant, and there are other E models that are goign to fly in the future. The restoration is beautiful, and I think that plans are to eventually place it on display in one piece, but in a diorama setting of it on it's belly. I do agree with you that it will be better once put in one piece. Not every warbird should or could be a flyer

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:09 pm 
Offline
Taylorcraft Racing

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:29 pm
Posts: 832
Location: Amorica
RMAllnutt wrote:
What is the story behind the stall in her display anyway?

Cheers,
Richard


Richard,

I believe there is (still) some issue as to the future of Blue Ash airport where the new building was to be build. There has been much pressure to close the field, and I doubt the owner wants to build a new building for the -17 and then find out the airport is being sold for development. As I understand it and remember it the restoration hangar is to small to display the B-17 in one piece.

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:28 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Thanks for the follow-ups guys... I guess that explains why the frenetic activity has slowed to a crawl. You'd think that some decisions on the fate of the airport would have been decided in the last 6 or 7 years though (which is how long the project appears to have been dormant)!

Cheers,
Richard

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:33 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5210
Location: Stratford, CT.
Interesting,

I’m still hoping that two very special, very important hangers get some TLC soon. If I showed you guys some pictures you'd have a heart attack. These hangers are located in Stratford and are still in a state of disrepair.

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 12:25 pm
Posts: 119
Location: Cincinnati. Ohio
The future of my gal sal is looking very bright at this time. The City of Cicinnait and the city of Blue Ash have agreed on the seliing of the property. The airport is to remain and airport all but a little modified. The rest of the land is going to be turned into a park, an art museum, and a building where the owner of My gal Sal can put here together and build the museum that he thought of many years ago. I talked to one of the volunteers a month or so ago and they are planning on getting back to work. So in a few years there will be another B-17 on display


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:14 pm
Posts: 466
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
There has been some significant politics surrounding the fate of Blue Ash airport, but recently all parties involved have come to an agreement that appears as if it will work for everyone. The current plan (which may have changed since I last heard about it, and will no doubt evolve over time) is to relocate the taxiways to make use of the existing greenspace for a park and some civic goodies. (Right now the taxiways and runway form a triangle, which is not very economical in terms of space)

The overall result should be a nice recreational space for the city, but may mean the end of the annual air show they hold there, since there would then be a populated area very close to the air space.

_________________
What is red, furry and on your six?
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 11:18 pm
Posts: 142
she will never be complete because I have a peice of her........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:14 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
I was fortunate enough to tour Sal about 2 years ago. The level of detail in the restoration of the fuselage was incredible. They were very lucky in some ways, in that Sal was never restored, converted for civilian use, stripped, etc. so all of the wartime equipment was present, the dataplates, etc. were all there. On the downside, she was pretty badly wrecked from her years of exposure on the ice cap.

It was interesting to find that the walls in the cockpit and radio compartment are both fully upholstered, as was done on early B-17's. Obviously, the later models dispensed with this luxury, probably to save construction time, reduce cost and weight, and to remove flammable materials from the aircraft.

I've been up in Aluminum Overcast and Fuddy Duddy, and was surprised at how much more cramped Sal seemed than the other two. Why? Because all the go-to-war stuff is still installed in Sal. I'm 5'7", 155 lbs and found the airplane to be a tight squeeze. It must have been incredibly difficult to move around inside while wearing a heated flight suit and 'chute. I don't see how those guys did it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:50 am
Posts: 484
Location: Wichita, KS
Kyleb wrote:
I was fortunate enough to tour Sal about 2 years ago. The level of detail in the restoration of the fuselage was incredible. They were very lucky in some ways, in that Sal was never restored, converted for civilian use, stripped, etc. so all of the wartime equipment was present, the dataplates, etc. were all there. On the downside, she was pretty badly wrecked from her years of exposure on the ice cap.

It was interesting to find that the walls in the cockpit and radio compartment are both fully upholstered, as was done on early B-17's. Obviously, the later models dispensed with this luxury, probably to save construction time, reduce cost and weight, and to remove flammable materials from the aircraft.

I've been up in Aluminum Overcast and Fuddy Duddy, and was surprised at how much more cramped Sal seemed than the other two. Why? Because all the go-to-war stuff is still installed in Sal. I'm 5'7", 155 lbs and found the airplane to be a tight squeeze. It must have been incredibly difficult to move around inside while wearing a heated flight suit and 'chute. I don't see how those guys did it.


Those two are G-models as well.

Quote:
The overall result should be a nice recreational space for the city, but may mean the end of the annual air show they hold there, since there would then be a populated area very close to the air space.


Take a look at Jabara Airport in Wichita. They hold an airshow there every year, even though we've got housing galore at one end of the runway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:48 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
I got a chance to tour "Sal" in November of '05, and was very impressed. A friend set up a private tour for my girlfreind and me, and we spent an hour or so looking around. He's got quite a museum setup..just needs a building big enough to house it.

As mentioned, the restoration wasn't done to airworthy standards..they used pop-rivets to attach much of the skin, and painted her with a brush and roller..but she still looks beautiful. They've had manaquins made in the likenesses of the crew. They're also using the original smashed ball turret, as well as the #3 prop, which was cut down with a hacksaw so the crew could run the engine aftet the crash to charge the batteries for the radio.

Here are a few pics...

SN


Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 281 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group