This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Mon May 21, 2007 11:21 pm
Mon May 21, 2007 11:29 pm
what a dissection!!!
Mon May 21, 2007 11:48 pm
what would be the chances of making a sticky for these pics? i see at least a couple hundred very good quality pics, seems a shame to lose them in the other topics..... how do I ask about that?? anyone in charge here?
Tue May 22, 2007 12:20 am
OK somebody tell me what is the deal with the tail hook? was the Duck also designed for carrier ops, and some Ducks have them and others don't .
Malo
Tue May 22, 2007 12:27 am
is it as simple as Coast Guard planes didnt land on carriers so no need for hook?
Tue May 22, 2007 12:38 am
Hi Armyjunk2,
Great photos, good scanning job. I always wondered how the guys got in and out of that Duck mockup without breaking anything!
I've sent you a PM, be good to hear back from you.
Cheers
Tue May 22, 2007 3:23 am
ok..... 1st question...... what came 1st the chicken, or the egg???? 2nd question............. did the grumman duck do carrier ops????
Tue May 22, 2007 9:03 am
The Ducks were designed for Carrier ops, but I don't think they were so equipped until a later version.
Tue May 22, 2007 9:11 pm
Look at the 4th photo down, the aircraft is assigned to the U.S.S. Ranger CV 4.
Tue May 22, 2007 10:43 pm
Forgotten Field wrote:The Ducks were designed for Carrier ops, but I don't think they were so equipped until a later version.
Correctamundo FF, the Duck was designed as an all around utility bird for the
Navy. JF-1's were equipped with a hook. The JF-2's went to the Coasties, so the hook was deleated. The later JF-3's didn't have a hook either...
When the J2F's(model G-15) showed-up the carrier gear returned and I assume
varied from where or how it served.
Hard to believe the Duck once held the world speed record for amphibians at 191mph!
Great stuff Armyjunk2!!! As for sticky-ing your Grummans...Keep 'em coming and
we'll keep your posts on Page 1! Scott,(the Boss of WIX) will have to create a special place for you!
edit-Doh! fixed it!
Last edited by
airnutz on Tue May 22, 2007 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tue May 22, 2007 11:20 pm
airnutz wrote:I presume because by that time the carriers had grown so and the biplane
probably landed with room to spare on a carrier bearing into a headwind.
Hard to believe the Duck once held the world speed record for amphibians at 191mph!
Always knew it was a classy 'plane.

I'm no expert, but it's perhaps worth mentioning that the 30s were the period of the introduction of hooks and wires to a lot of carrier operations around the word. The essentially similar (in capability) Supermarine Walrus never had a hook fitted but was expected to land on carriers - and did, perfectly well. I'd imagine a biplane with flaps and the performance of the duck didn't really
need a hook either, unless, perhaps, heavily loaded, although it would make a lot of sense.
Incidentally, talking of 'fast' biplane amphibians, a civilian operated (warbird...) Supermarine Walrus
won a post-war air race!
Tue May 22, 2007 11:55 pm
JDK wrote:airnutz wrote:I presume because by that time the carriers had grown so and the biplane
probably landed with room to spare on a carrier bearing into a headwind.
Hard to believe the Duck once held the world speed record for amphibians at 191mph!
Always knew it was a classy 'plane.

I'm no expert, but it's perhaps worth mentioning that the 30s were the period of the introduction of hooks and wires to a lot of carrier operations around the word. The essentially similar (in capability) Supermarine Walrus never had a hook fitted but was expected to land on carriers - and did, perfectly well. I'd imagine a biplane with flaps and the performance of the duck didn't really
need a hook either, unless, perhaps, heavily loaded, although it would make a lot of sense.
Incidentally, talking of 'fast' biplane amphibians, a civilian operated (warbird...) Supermarine Walrus
won a post-war air race!
Ouch James, you caught me making a goof. Somethng didn't "ring true" after my post...
so I popped over to aerofiles to get schooled. I was mixing my JF's(G-7 and G-10) with my J2F's (G-15). The hooks were on the later models as well, although it appears application varied with their jobs or needs.
As far as the my assumption about the Duck not needing a hook, I forgot to
account for the Duck's high roll center and narrow undercarriage...a consideration the
Walrus did not suffer from. Duck's were(are), not forgiving in a crosswind ..
nor I'll wager...on a pitching deck. A tailhook would be helpful on stabbing the beastie home.
Edit...A good page for a quick overview of the Duck..
www.aviation-history.com/grumman/j2f.html
and for any newbies, aerofiles
www.aerofiles.com
Last edited by
airnutz on Wed May 23, 2007 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wed May 23, 2007 12:08 am
Mistakes? No worries - I'm still sure you're right.
airnutz wrote:As far as the my assumption about the Duck not needing a hook, I forgot to account for the Duck's high roll center and narrow undercarriage...a consideration the Walrus did not suffer from. Duck's were(are), not forgiving in a crosswind ..nor I'll wager...on a pitching deck. A tailhook would be helpful on stabbing the beastie home.
Good point.
Fri May 25, 2007 6:04 am
hi all
found one more...
Martin
Sun May 27, 2007 4:59 pm
Swiss Mustangs wrote:hi all
found one more...
As of this posting, ya'll have a few more hours to own this photo...
Look Here
Fade to Black...
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.