This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Mosquito video

Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:41 pm

Most of you have already seen this, but I just saw this one for the first time. I really like the way this plane is somewhat agressively flown.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRGwfNrnWsc

In my "mosquito" search on youtube I also found this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IKTfe5TBmY

Pretty neat, but not really warbird related. Incredible "toy" none-the-less.

Cheers,

David

Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:01 pm

it drew blood & manuevered like the bug it was named after, but purrs like a kitten. cool video!!

Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:27 pm

How was it lost?

Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:42 pm

How do you not fly in aggressively?
Its quite the hot rod isnt it?

Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:45 pm

oscardeuce wrote:How was it lost?

Stall/spin during steep turn after a zoom climb at an airshow.

Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:53 pm

That is a pretty impressive display.

Eric

Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:46 pm

DB2 wrote:
oscardeuce wrote:How was it lost?

Stall/spin during steep turn after a zoom climb at an airshow.


It was at Barton aerodrome, nr Manchester, 21 July 1996, a week after TFC lost their P38 & chief pilot, Hoof Proudfoot. :cry:

It lost power on the left engine during the start of a wingover to the right after completing a high speed pass.

There is a video of the the crash YouTube.

You might want to check out the AAIB report into the crash:

http://www.aaib.gov.uk/publications/bul ... 501355.cfm

Btw, there's also another video from the same show on YouTube as well:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZLnOlaFGac

Cheers

Paul

Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:44 am

OK, without trying to open a can of worms, or place blame etc, at what point do we go from "aggressive flying" to out of control flying?

Many of us fly airshows under similar circumstances, and need to be vigilant we do not let the adrenaline get away from us. It sounds like he was near the edge of the envelope, and an engine coughed. If he had not been so close to the edge he may have been able to recover.

Again, not blaming the pilot, just trying to discuss how we can safely display these old aircraft.

Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:34 pm

oscardeuce wrote:OK, without trying to open a can of worms, or place blame etc, at what point do we go from "aggressive flying" to out of control flying?

Many of us fly airshows under similar circumstances, and need to be vigilant we do not let the adrenaline get away from us. It sounds like he was near the edge of the envelope, and an engine coughed. If he had not been so close to the edge he may have been able to recover.

Again, not blaming the pilot, just trying to discuss how we can safely display these old aircraft.


Oscar,

I think you make a good point, as the safe operation of historic aircraft is important, but I think the term 'aggressively flown', like the term ‘flown in a spirited manner’ (which is often used to describe a display), is rather ambiguous, and might be interpreted by some that an aircraft was being flown dangerously, or as you say, close to the limits, when it couldn't be further from the truth.

Having read several articles by pilots who flew RR299, it was clear that it was flown to strict limits - that is to say the power settings were kept sensible to conserve engine life, (and also due to the fact that the Mosquito was operating at lighter weights than when in RAF service), speed was limited to around 260kts, and from what I remember, the g was limited to +3 and no intentional negative.

Therefore, the display was kept simple to stay within these limits, with no aerobatic manoeuvres being flown. As can be seen from the videos, these consisted of a series of climbs, descents & wingovers, and a like any safe display, one where speed is traded for height & height traded for speed.

According to an article on flying the Mosquito by Peter Henley, who flew RR299 for a number of years, this type of display worked well, giving almost 250kts on level passes, with the speed bleeding off to about 160kts at the top of a wingover, and recovering to just under 250kts again on the next level pass.

This matches up pretty well with what the speed estimates in the AAIB report where, and the routine being flown on the day of the accident would have been similar to the sequence in the videos, although Barton was a smaller airfield than North Weald, which was where the display was in the two videos above.

Now, one factor I haven't mentioned yet is the single engine safety speed of the Mosquito, because with any twin engined aircraft, this critical in the display environment as the airspeed could fall below it, during the apex of wingover for example.

The Pilots Notes for the FB.VI aren't very clear or precise about it (and Peter Henley mentions this in his article), but state that "Although safety speed may be a little less in some cases, particularly at light load and with narrow-blade propellers, it is recommended that 175kts be attained before starting to climb, especially if paddle blades are fitted" (which, as he mentions, RR299 did).

My personal belief is that RR299 was not being flown in a ‘dangerous’ or 'close to the limits' manner during the above videos, or during the fatal Barton display. The AAIB report supports this, as it does not conclude that the crash was caused by the manner in which the aircraft was being flown.

Cheers

Paul

P.S. Here’s another video of RR299 taken 12 years earlier:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgijBdX-yPk

Tue Apr 17, 2007 2:15 pm

Now when I said that the Mossie was being flown in a somewhat aggressive manner, what I really meant is that it looked like the pilot knew the plane really well and flew it with great precision. His maneuvres made me feel like he knew the limits of the plane, knew what it could and couldn't do, and wasn't affraid to fly it (like is the case with some warbird displays).

In no way did I ever consider his flying at all dangerous... It just looked umm... spirited.


Here's an interesting video too. Makes me want to watch that movie again, that one with the Mossie squadron. I forget the name. Any help would be apprecaited.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOhZEsIq85E

Cheers,

David

Tue Apr 17, 2007 2:50 pm

daveymac82c wrote:Makes me want to watch that movie again, that one with the Mossie squadron. I forget the name. Any help would be apprecaited.



It was called, "633 Squadron", and as I recall, it was very entertaining. Just don't ask me who starred in it. :roll:

Cheers!

Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:05 pm

Wasn't Cliff Robertson in 633 squadron?

Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:16 pm

yup, that's him!! quite the gentleman. got his autograph at the aviation hall of fame dinner awards cerimony in 2003. he also owned a spitfire at 1 time.

Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:25 pm

Ah right 633 Squadron. Thank you!

-David

Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:03 pm

daveymac82c wrote:Now when I said that the Mossie was being flown in a somewhat aggressive manner, what I really meant is that it looked like the pilot knew the plane really well and flew it with great precision. His maneuvres made me feel like he knew the limits of the plane, knew what it could and couldn't do, and wasn't affraid to fly it (like is the case with some warbird displays).

In no way did I ever consider his flying at all dangerous... It just looked umm... spirited.


David,

I knew what you meant, but as I said in my post, it's down to how people interpret the word 'aggressive'!

From what oscardeuce said in his post, it would appear he interpreted 'aggressive manner' as being flown 'close to the edge', whereas I didn't! :wink:

Cheers

Paul
Post a reply