Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jan 16, 2026 10:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:25 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2938
The editon of FlyPast on the news stands here has a blurb from Frank Mormillo (sp?) concerning the CAF P-82. He says the ownership issue has been resolved and it will remain with the CAF! Great news, but I was surprised that a British mag had the scoop. Can anyone confirm this info?
I hope I did not let a twin tail suprise from Gary Austin out of the bag.... :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 701
Location: Dallas / Midland TX
With Gary's admitted dislike (ok maybe that's too harsh a word) for the Merlin engine maintainance schedule, he surely could not look forward to anything requiring two of them to be running at the same time. :D Not to mention the other bits of that bird that are made of 100% unobtanium.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:51 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4673
Location: Cheshire, CT
Warbirdnerd wrote:
I hope I did not let a twin tail suprise from Gary Austin out of the bag.... :oops:


I don't think you did. The P-82 has been visible in the background of some of Gary's postings.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Last edited by Jerry O'Neill on Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: P_82
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:29 pm
Posts: 178
Location: VA
After just returning from Midland from Winter Staff, unless this has happen since Saturday, we were told by Bob Rice that the issue is NOT resolved.

Mike Hogan
National Capitol Squadron


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Powerplant
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:33 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1663
Location: Baltimore MD
I thought they were Allisons... That makes them 'Merican, so Gary should like working on them...

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 476
Location: MD in body, TX in spirit
Whatever happened with the Tom Cruise connection which was announced several months ago. Or is he now to busy being a flake for the news media.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:41 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
It wouldn't be the first time the membership of the CAF was mislead. My monies on the British rag.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:05 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
MX304 wrote:
he surely could not look forward to anything requiring two of them to be running at the same time. :D .


Is it even possible to keep two Merlins running at the same time? :lol: :lol:

Forgotten Field...I don't know the complete history of the Twin Mustangs, but I'm pretty sure that the early ones (like the P-82 here) all had Merlins. When the "Great Twin Mustang Mechanic Walkout" occurred, the government and North American Aviation was forced to put real engines on the airplane. And although it was determined that the R-2800 (or any other round engine of comparible horsepower) would have been the obvious choice, they opted to stay with the steam powered engine, and the new, 2200 h.p. Allison was the direction they went on future Twin Mustangs.

You believe all of that, right? :wink: :lol:

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 349
Location: South Central Minnesota
Steve S wrote:
Whatever happened with the Tom Cruise connection which was announced several months ago. Or is he now to busy being a flake for the news media.


To answer your question, the ownership debate has not yet been resolved. The CAF has initiated a law suite against the USAF to determine ownership and put this issue to rest once and for all. Win or lose, at least it will be a done deal and the CAF can move forward and put its energy to better use. The individual who has offered to pay for its restoration has also agreed to cover all of the legal cost incurred during this process.

Steve be nice. Your condescending remarks about Tom Cruise are not warranted or desired on this or any other public forum.

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 2:19 pm
Posts: 259
Location: Hershey, PA
Quote:
The P-82 has been visible in the background of some of Gay's postings


i don't think his postings are gay :lol:

_________________
Jeff


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:46 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4673
Location: Cheshire, CT
dors wrote:
Quote:
The P-82 has been visible in the background of some of Gay's postings


i don't think his postings are gay :lol:


OOPS! :oops:
Sorry about that GARY!
It was almost 1:00am when I posted that and I guess my fingers slipped.
Jerry-The Embarassed!

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:19 am
Posts: 429
Location: new York
dors wrote:
Quote:
The P-82 has been visible in the background of some of Gay's postings


i don't think his postings are gay :lol:


Not that there's anything wrong with that . . .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:36 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
John wrote:
Quote:
Steve be nice. Your condescending remarks about Tom Cruise are not warranted or desired on this or any other public forum.


John...Don't know whether that was sarcasm or not. If it was, please let me know before I respond with something harsh. :?

Mudge the curious

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:42 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
First off, just to set a record straight in my book, I met Tom Cruise once, and he was very nice to me. He has a restored P-51D which is named Kiss Me Kate, and is beautiful. Why would it be so wrong or bad for Tom Cruise to want to be involved in the CAF's P-82? God knows if I was in his position that I would be wanting to do some stuff like that as well. Instead of knocking the guy for his personal beliefs, we should be thankful that someone wants to come forward and dump a little money into a rare warbird restoration. Now the news with the P-82 and the NMUSAF is interesting. It is going to comedown to who owns it. If the NMUSAF owns it, she will never fly again. I do not know anything of the details, so I am not even going to venture a guess of what is going on.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:19 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
mustangdriver wrote:
If the NMUSAF owns it, she will never fly again.


That's not entirely true. There are several instances were AF Museum aircraft have gone on to fly again. Thank god the NMUSAF doesn't demill their own aircraft. :shock:

-The Lackland HU-16

-The Mk. XIV Spit now flys in NZ

-The Buchon 109 I belive is flying now.

And these aircraft, to name a few, were repatriated to the skies through trades with the museum. Perhaps the CAF needs to work out a deal if possible for something the Museum wants.

I don't know about now, but when I worked there the Museum had a flyable T-6 parked on Wright-Patt's ramp for the curator's use.

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bradburger and 136 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group