k5083 wrote:
I do not know whether that Barracuda photo is protected by copyright or not. Certainly it was at one time. If it was under Crown copyright, then it may have passed into the public domain because the term of pre-1957 Crown copyrighted photographs (50 years from creation) has expired. However, the wikimedia page is incorrect in saying that it was created by an unknown airman of the Fleet Air Arm or Royal Navy. It was created by Charles Brown, who never was in the military or the British government. He photographed freelance for magazines, but also did some commission work for the government. Whether copyright belonged to Brown, to a publisher, or to the Crown may depend on for whom Brown happened to be working, the agreement they had, and on British work-for-hire doctrine. If it belonged to Brown, it would be protected through 2052.
Wikipedia and wikimedia are not trustworthy on the copyright status of individual photographs. They tend to make self-serving assumptions, as in this case, to conclude that material is in the public domain. Robbie, it isn't generally my practice to bust people's chops for posting photos that may be protected, and I have no objection to the posting. I only wanted to correct the oversimplified statements with respect to the public domain. It turns out you were relying on them in good faith, but where wiki is concerned, I would caution against doing so.
August
Thank you for your reply August. I guess we learn something everyday.
Regards
Robbie