Matt Gunsch wrote:
It is very simple not to blame the guy, unless he crossed a taxyway, or a runway, he did nothing wrong, he was taking pictures.
Well, here's a few quotes from the conversation that follows the original story...one from a witness, and one from the photog himself.
Quote:
was there says:
Before you make any conclusions, he walked away from the "Tarmac" and crossed an active runway. All with out any ones permission.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 10:06AM
To which the photog responded...
Quote:
Danno says:
Hey "was there". You are right, I was ignorant of the rules and Laws. Clear something up for us, in layman's terms, would you? What are the differences between Tarmac, Runway, Taxi Way, and what color stripes differentiate the rules they imply?
Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 10:38AM
THis is interesting as well.
Quote:
Airport Ops (different airport) says:
I work for a airport (not this one) in the operations department.
This has nothing to do with being USSA or him having a camera. It just has to do with an incursion on a movement area. You can have people walk all around the general aviation ramp area, but any taxiways & runways are off limits without permission from the control tower. Not permission from the pilots. Pilots have to follow the same rules or the same result would happen to them.
So this guy made a mistake. VPD (vehicle/pedestrian deviation) are somewhat common, but each airport handles them differently.
This is a none event and not the result of a class war or Obama taking away our guns.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 12:05PM
Another informed opinion here...
Quote:
pthomas745 says:
Please read the post again by Airport Ops...he is the only one that has figured this ridiculous blog post out.
The guy taking pictures was probably on an airport movement area. The "cop" who came up was probably from airport security.
"Homeland Security" will have nothing to do with this incident. The FAA's incursion report ( if they filed one) will go to the Flight Standards District Office.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 9:47PM
And lastly, this guy seems to have been part of the process somewhere along the line based on the information he shares...
Quote:
Anonymous says:
pthomas745 and Airport Ops are absolutely correct. This had nothing to do with the fact that the man was taking pictures. It was a runway incursion, and it was filed with FAA as such. This guy was in the Movement Area without the permission of the Airport, and without being in radio contact with the Tower. That is criminal trespass. There are signs all over the airport fence at Addison that tell you as much. The pilots of the airplane are not authorized to give him permission to enter the movement areas. Neither is the flight museum. The issue at hand is the safety of aircraft operations. It has jack-nothing to do with DHS or TSA.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 23 2009 @ 10:04PM
I wanted to avoid making a textwall out of this, but it seems that these quotes have become important to the conversation here.
Matt Gunsch wrote:
You seem to be the type that goes along with what ever the TSA says.
Matt, I think you've completely misinterpreted the point I've been trying to make this whole time.
I make every single bit of my living, and support my family, as a photographer. Like Danno,I am not a fulltime aviation photographer. This means that, if I go into a new situation, I need to find out what rules govern my conduct. I'm the team photographer for the Columbus Crew of Major League Soccer, for example. There are places I can shoot from that media photographers cannot, and those rules are based on the bylaws on FIFA, the international soccer governing body. If RandomRookieSoccerShooter tries to shoot from between the benches, security will escort him away from there.
Similarly, if I want to shoot from the opposite side of the runway because the light's better over there, I'm not going to go walking over there without confirming with airport authorities that I can do that. I've probably had a 75% success rate when I've asked to do such a thing (including the time the tower gave me a radio and told me to call in as 'White Taurus 1' before I moved onto the runway). The reasons to do this are twofold...first is that I get the shots I need this time, and second is that next time, they remember me as someone who followed the rules and didn't cause a potential operatonal problem.
That is exactly what Danno the Photog did NOT do. He wandered into areas where he shouldn't have been without clearing it with the proper authorities. Therefore, the intial fault is his.
Lastly, whether we like it or not, times
have changed. Just recently the FBI broke up a plot in New York that included bombing synagogues and shooting down a military aircraft with a shoulder-fired missile. I can remember flying without having to go through security, but times and events forced this to change.
I am NOT defending TSA, nor am I saying that everything done in the the name of security is justified. I maintain, however, that the fault here starts with the photographer.
Longest post I've ever made on here.