Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:47 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:33 am
Posts: 474
after reading the 262 thread there seems to be an intrest in the possibiltyof reproduction aircraft to continue warbird operations in the future(fuel prices withstanding).
this was done on the flypast site a while ago bt i dont know if it has been done here f it has i apoligise for bringing it back up.
so what extinct or neart extinct aircraft type would you lie to see back in the air.
my top few.
1 westland whirlwind fighter.
2 ki46 dinah.
3 ki84 frank.
4 ca 11 woomera.
5 ca15.
6 j7w1 shinden.
7 ta 154 moskito.
8 n1k2 george.
9 ki 45 nick
10 f1m2 pete


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Besides all of the normal axis aircraft, I would REALLY like to see a limited production run of TBD Devastators. How hard could it be to make, it's a simple 1930's design airframe. The hardest part is getting one to make patterns off of. It will never happen as long as the Naval Historical Center has anything to say about it.

Does anyone know if the blueprints are still in existence?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:50 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
F4B-4, a bunch of 'em
A-17
F11C Goshawk
F9C-2 Sparrowhawk
Northrop Alpha, Northrop Gamma

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:04 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4337
Location: Battle Creek, MI
If cost/difficulty isn't an option, I'd love to see a Martin Maryland or Baltimore. Or any Axis bomber..seems like there have been enough partial wrecks rcovereed to a build a composite/reproduction Ju-88. A "Betty," "Sally," or "Nell" would also be cool. Heck, I'd be thrilled just to see any of those restored as static museum aircraft.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:09 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4669
Location: Cheshire, CT
SB2U Vindicator
Boeing F4B
Curtiss P-6E Hawk
OS2U Kingfisher

that's all for now!
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 259
Location: Addison, Texas
Yeah I would also LOVE to see a Devastator. Its my favorite Navy bomber and the thought that we COULD see one right now upsets me......Im sure you all know what I mean.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:31 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:10 am
Posts: 1536
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
How about the SBD Dauntless? There's essentially none available for private purchase, but there's plenty of them out there to draw patterns from (Navy loaners). Plus it's a relatively docile type to operate as I understand it. Straight forward design and plenty of engines around.

Other than that, how about the Ryan STM? C'mon, you know it's pretty. :D

Image

_________________
Rob Mears
'Surviving Corsairs' Historian
robcmears@yahoo.com
http://www.robmears.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: OV 10 bronco
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 962
Location: my home planet is EARTH!
...well you asked.. :D
Image

_________________
EVERYTHING that CAN fly should be ALLOWED to FLY!
IWO JIMA'S best narative..."GOD ISN'T HERE"
http://www.amazon.com/God-Isnt-Here-Ame ... 0976154706


P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.

S: Took hammer away from midget.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:17 am
Posts: 76
Location: Ontario, Canada
Ryan STA / STM
now that would be a realistic project!
A run of say 8-10 airframes, planning say 1-2 on floats, what a fantastic aircraft.
This is a relatively simple aircraft, very basic airframe, and a number of engines can be used instead of a Menasco, such as a Cirrus, or a LOM.
Lets hope someone tools up and produces this aircraft.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:17 am
Posts: 76
Location: Ontario, Canada
Ryan STA / STM
now that would be a realistic project!
A run of say 8-10 airframes, planning say 1-2 on floats, what a fantastic aircraft.
This is a relatively simple aircraft, very basic airframe, and a number of engines can be used instead of a Menasco, such as a Cirrus, or a LOM.
Lets hope someone tools up and produces this aircraft.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
I love the idea of a Ki-46 Dinah. However, as a more realistic choice I've always thought the Fiat G.50 had potential. A simple design with good proportions that could be powered by an available American radial.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:31 am
Posts: 161
Do-17
Do-217
He-177
Ju-188

Don't forget the German stuff!

None of those 3 exist, yet they built about 1500 of each type.

_________________
Do-17z fact and history site, setting it straight.
There is something deeply wrong with a society more offended by breasts than by entrails.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:54 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:41 pm
Posts: 1475
Location: North Texas
The Ryan is an easy one. A full set of plans are available from Ed Cass...something. Last time I looked, there were about $800 for a set. Ed's version uses a LOM engine if I remember correctly. An STM-S2 with the Menasco would be pretty cool too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: why not the 337?
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 962
Location: my home planet is EARTH!
Flying Pencil wrote:
Do-17
Do-217
He-177
Ju-188

Don't forget the German stuff!

None of those 3 exist, yet they built about 1500 of each type.


id love to see one of those monsters :D

_________________
EVERYTHING that CAN fly should be ALLOWED to FLY!
IWO JIMA'S best narative..."GOD ISN'T HERE"
http://www.amazon.com/God-Isnt-Here-Ame ... 0976154706


P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.

S: Took hammer away from midget.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:05 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11330
P-43 and P-66?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Paul Stroud and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group