Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 11:27 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 12:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 7:10 pm
Posts: 648
Location: tempe, az
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/aubrey-sa ... 05553.html

What's the big deal? Is it really in the country's best interest to not let him serve?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 1:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:49 am
Posts: 659
It's never been about best interest, it's about special interests.

And yeah it's a stupid decision. Who cares. let him fly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 2:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:06 pm
Posts: 143
Location: Circling the Globe
Well, I guess now we know the identity of the WSO holding the rubber fist in the photo below........

Image

_________________
**
WANTED --> F-101 Voodoo photos, slides, negatives, memorabilia.
**
WANTED --> photos, slides, negs of Aircraft in storage at NAF LITCHFIELD PARK.
**
WANTED --> ADC Interceptor Magazine - 1959-1979
**


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 3:36 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
SuperGuppy wrote:
Well, I guess now we know the identity of the WSO holding the rubber fist in the photo below........

lol :D
Who cares if he's gay or not. That doesn't mean anything for his skills! Back off and let the guy fly!

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 6:45 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
i agree, he should serve with honor & respect. but the media does what it does best..... trashes the victim, so sorry to say it's probably a moot cause.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:58 am
Posts: 208
As a civilian, I'm inclined to let the military decide how best to establish and maintain military order and discipline.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 7:10 pm
Posts: 648
Location: tempe, az
skydaddy61 wrote:
As a civilian, I'm inclined to let the military decide how best to establish and maintain military order and discipline.


Civilian direction was necessary to integrate the military in the '40's, bringing the services more into line with changes in society.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:58 am
Posts: 208
michaelharadon wrote:
skydaddy61 wrote:
As a civilian, I'm inclined to let the military decide how best to establish and maintain military order and discipline.


Civilian direction was necessary to integrate the military in the '40's, bringing the services more into line with changes in society.


Check your timeline, Mike - the racial integration of the services *preceded* civilian desegregation by a couple of decades.

Military society is not civilian society. It's a different world. It's not my world (the USAF didn't want a four-eyed, flatfooted asthmatic), but I know many current and retired service personnel. I respect their judgements about what works - and what doesn't - in their world.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 12:57 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:58 am
Posts: 1054
Location: In Your Screen
The rules in the military are clear, homosexuals are not allowed to serve.

_________________
"No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" R.R.

Welcome to the USSA! One Nanny State Under the Messiah, Indivisible with Tyranny, Higher Taxes, Socialism, Radical Environmentalism and a Loss of Income for all. Boy I'm proud to be a part of the USSA, what can I do to raise taxes, oh boy oh boy!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:58 am
Posts: 208
A2C wrote:
The rules in the military are clear, homosexuals are not allowed to serve.


No, they can serve under current policy; they just can't openly disclose their orientation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 1:25 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
skydaddy61 wrote:
A2C wrote:
The rules in the military are clear, homosexuals are not allowed to serve.


No, they can serve under current policy; they just can't openly disclose their orientation.

It's a step forward, but I hope they change the rules very soon. It started with African Americans in the AAF. They were black so they couldn't fly, right? Higher ups described them as cowardly and lacking intelligence. Then it was women. Surely women in the military can't be? Would you want a female in combat with you? Now both African Americans and women have served with distinction in the military for years and have proven they are equal. Now we have a guy that has proven himself multiple times in combat, teaches the new generation their first steps and he's threatened to be thrown out of the military because they found out he's gay? Does that make him not qualified to serve? I don't think he would've made Lt. Col if he didn't have what it takes!

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 1:59 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3291
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Well, I've flown with him.

And I'd fly with him again.

I think that the vast majority of professional warriors I fly with don't give a rat's ass about your gender, color, or sexual orientation so long as you can be skilled and disciplined while you kill bad guys and protect good ones.

BTW, the rubber fist in the photo posted earlier in this thread is sort of a squadron in-joke. When fighter units deploy out to Las Vegas for Red Flag and the many other exercises that take place out there, they frequently spend their off time partaking in all kinds of off-the-wall partying.

One activity that is a regular fighter squadron social activity is called a 'road rally'. The road rally is basically a competitive scavenger hunt that takes place over a wide geographic area (the Las Vegas Valley, for instance) and frequently includes stops at locations or required events that are generally rather embarassing; get a female blackjack dealer's panties at the Sahara; get a photo of your squadron patch with a naked stripper, etc.

The fist was simply a required pick-up from the Adult Superstore out there during a road rally several years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: MEH....
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 786
Location: US
I don't care what you do in your personal life...just don't shove it down my throat.... :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:58 am
Posts: 208
Randy Haskin wrote:
Well, I've flown with him.

And I'd fly with him again.


And there's the voice of experience; the only one that really matters.

BTW, thank you for your service, sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 4:30 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
Randy Haskin wrote:
Well, I've flown with him.

And I'd fly with him again.

I think that the vast majority of professional warriors I fly with don't give a rat's ass about your gender, color, or sexual orientation so long as you can be skilled and disciplined while you kill bad guys and protect good ones.


I have to agree. It's a vocal extreme minority who do you kiss your mother with that mouth? things up by being the sugar they are, and our military lets em get away with it out of fear that they're somehow more needed than the rest of us. I say screw the homophobes. A gay man serving is no more disruptive than a woman serving. And the same rules should apply. I have served with gay grunts, and never had a single problem from any of them. The only people who still make this an issue are people we can do without.

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group