Fouga23 wrote:
I too wonder why there is no thunderstreak/flash flying.
Although when I see how many crashed due to engine and other problems,....

What source are you getting your information from??? I have found nothing to substantiate you claim. Please correct me if I'm in error.
Joe Baugher wrote:
The pilots of the TAC and SAC found the F-84F to be a rather difficult plane to fly. Its loaded weight of 20,000 pounds and its landing speed of 155 mph made it a rather "hot" ship for pilots who were more familiar to lighter and slower-landing machines, and it took a bit of getting used to. In addition, the handling properties of the F-84F were somewhat tricky, and certain maneuvers were deemed too dangerous to perform except in extreme emergencies. Nevertheless, the F-84F achieved a reputation for being of extremely robust construction and of high reliability, and it offered a relatively smooth ride through turbulent low-level air.
Here is Mr. Baugher's write-up on the Thunderstreak.
http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p84_10.html
No where does it make any mention of engine difficulties.
Other aircraft that used these series of J-65:
Douglas A4D Skyhawk
Martin B-57 Canberra
Grumman F11F Tiger
Republic F-84F Thunderstreak
North American FJ-2 Fury
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis