Oh yes, one more comment... the original quote for the acquisition was close to $50,000. It was only after we (Boomer) dug in and really started examining all the fine print that we determined that all but about $10-$15K of that was fees and costs associated with using third-party contractors, which would go bye-bye if we did those tasks ourselves. I can't speak for the Navy but it's entirely possible that a lot of museums either didn't look beyond the initial price estimates, or they decided that they were unable to provide that level of labor. There may also be a factor based on the type of applicants... there is definitely a procedure in place with these kinds of things, so any Joe off the street with a lot of money and a T-hangar can't just walk up, claim to be a museum, and expect to have an F-14 on his ramp shortly thereafter. I suspect that they've had a whole lot of that kind of thing lately, and with the deeply concerning ongoing actions of Iran (which still has an F-14 fleet) I'm sure the Navy faces additional pressure to be extra careful to mind their P's and Q's with the disposal of these airframes. I'm all for any legitimate entity being able to have access to retired equipment for educational, historical, and display purposes, but I can also understand the political pressure to keep things that even seem like weapons (anything from airframes to jeeps to empty shell casings) away from folks who have less-than-honorable motives. I even have seen the effects of the "de-mil mentality" inside military-owned museums... the USAF museum at Warner Robins GA has an example of a mini-gun on an aircraft that has the barrels "de-milled" by welding the business ends closed in such a way that it looked like a 6-year-old got loose with a plasma torch... it was jaw-droppingly ridiculous, to say the least, but there it was.
That "CYA at all costs" mentality is what these folks have to deal with, which probably removes a bunch of applicants from the equation right from the start. If they've never heard of a requester before and can't easily find out all the necessary info, they likely just move onto the next one... I doubt it's that they assume that some small-town city council wanting a display for their local park is up to no good, but when there's a museum on the list that they've worked with and has already gone through the required steps and demonstrated that they are capable of properly displaying items, well, I think they probably would rather offer things to the known entities first.
The process of gaining GSA approval, non-profit status, establishing a relationship with the service's museums, etc. is largely just the way in which the government covers their butts. It's not the easiest process in the world, but it can be done if you want it enough to do what it takes, and have the patience to keep going. The good news is that anyone with an interest is very welcome and invited to join and be part of our group, and most other similar groups as well. The scarcest resource in aviation preservation isn't money or airframes, it's warm bodies willing to actually show up and do something!
Thanks again, I'll stop blabbing now
-Mike