This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Doolittle's Lightning ...

Fri Jan 28, 2022 7:37 pm

This aircraft served as General Jimmy Doolittle's personal aircraft! Caption: "P-38J-10-LO Lightning (serial number 42-67402). Photo taken while assigned to the 8th Air Force as a personal aircraft for Gen Jimmy Doolittle. Very first P-38J-10-LO model built by Lockheed. Aircraft damaged in a ground accident (hit by taxiing P-38 while parked) 17 Dec 44 at Warton, England. Repaired and subsequently transferred to the 430th Fighter Squadron, 474th Fighter Group as K6-F. Aircraft damaged in a landing accident at airfield R-2, Bad Langensalza, Germany on 4 June 1945."
https://www.americanairmuseum.com/media ... pSrJZImiXc

Image

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sat Jan 29, 2022 1:45 am

And when he didn't want the complication of two engines he had this one.
Image
Image

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sat Jan 29, 2022 11:22 am

He used more than one P-38.
LGEN James H. Doolittle in the cockpit of P-38H 42-66972 somewhere in England after returning from the Mediterranean to take command of the 8th AF.
Image

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:32 pm

It looks like the shell ejection holes are taped over for some reason.Was that common for a P-38?

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:49 pm

lucky52 wrote:It looks like the shell ejection holes are taped over for some reason.Was that common for a P-38?

Gun barrels are, also.

pop2

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sun Jan 30, 2022 7:48 am

P-38's were known to have poor cockpit heating, especially for the pilots feet. Perhaps, this being a transit flight, eliminating sources of draft might make sense.

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sun Jan 30, 2022 8:59 am

DH82EH wrote:P-38's were known to have poor cockpit heating, especially for the pilots feet. Perhaps, this being a transit flight, eliminating sources of draft might make sense.


I think the caption is poorly written. Maybe by accident, maybe to cause readers to think he flew the P-38 from Italy to England. Without knowledge of the facts, I seriously doubt that's what happened. You don't risk a General and all he knows by having him conduct a lengthy flight over occupied territory on a repositioning flight.

My guess is this photo was indeed taken after he flew back from the Med. Probably days or weeks after.

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sun Jan 30, 2022 9:58 am

That OD P-38 was most likely ‘a’ P-38 he flew but the NMF P-38 was ‘the’ P-38 dedicated for him to fly to base inspections in England I would think.

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sun Jan 30, 2022 10:15 am

I should at least mention that the fuselage insignia on the NMF P-38 is unusually incorrect with the white star extending to the edge of the blue disk. Jimmy, what were you thinking?

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sun Jan 30, 2022 11:47 am

I noticed that as well. I have seem many examples of unusually large, small and irregular configurations. More than one would think.

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Sun Jan 30, 2022 1:13 pm

From Ivie's "Patton's Eyes in the Sky"

Image

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Mon Jan 31, 2022 8:55 am

Kyleb wrote:
DH82EH wrote:P-38's were known to have poor cockpit heating, especially for the pilots feet. Perhaps, this being a transit flight, eliminating sources of draft might make sense.


I think the caption is poorly written. Maybe by accident, maybe to cause readers to think he flew the P-38 from Italy to England. Without knowledge of the facts, I seriously doubt that's what happened. You don't risk a General and all he knows by having him conduct a lengthy flight over occupied territory on a repositioning flight.

My guess is this photo was indeed taken after he flew back from the Med. Probably days or weeks after.


Per his bio, Doolittle frequently flew, sometimes on combat missions, while in command in the ETO.

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:00 am

aerovin wrote:I should at least mention that the fuselage insignia on the NMF P-38 is unusually incorrect with the white star extending to the edge of the blue disk. Jimmy, what were you thinking?


Given the amount of insignia changes in '43, is it possible this P-38 started life with the blue roundel and white star insignia that was used through June of '43, and the updated bars were added later, incorrectly? I've seen some posts complaining about inaccurate insignias on restorations, but it seems that innaccuracies can actually be historically accurate...

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Mon Jan 31, 2022 11:54 am

The odd thing is that even the star doesn't look geometrically correct, setting aside the mis-proportioned bars.

Also the serial on the tail doesn't look like the standard font.

Could this bird have been delivered in OD/NG and stripped in the field, then the markings reapplied? That type of thing accounts for 99% of the times when you see non-standard markings on wartime aircraft. This one is so far off that I would doubt that even an MU would have done it.

August

Re: Doolittle's Lightning ...

Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:29 pm

Mark Allen M wrote:Aircraft damaged in a landing accident at airfield R-2, Bad Langensalza, Germany on 4 June 1945.
Can you imagine being responsible for hitting Jimmy Doolittle's personal aircraft???
Post a reply