Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:27 am
Hunterfan wrote:Mark Sampson wrote:If nothing else, there was a recovery team that wasn't busy enough, and the CO gave them an assignment.
"My boys can do anything..."
There were so many aircraft accidents occurring at the time, the RAF maintenance unit recovery teams had more than enough to keep themselves busy.
But I agree with p51, the factories in the USA were turning out so much material that the effort required to separate, dismantle, inspect and re-label waterlogged parts from a wreck just wasn't worth it.
Just my opinion.
Tue Jan 11, 2022 2:22 pm
p51 wrote:shrike wrote:lucky52 wrote:I wonder why they pulled it out.
Because it's a brand new bomber and there was a war on?
A month in cold fresh water would be easily remediated
By 1944, B-17s weren't hard to get, nor parts for them. That seems like a huge expenditure in time and resources for a plane they likely wouldn't have done much with other than turning her into scrap.
Someone really didn't want to answer to their CO for losing all the .50 caliber machine guns?
Yeah, it doesn't make much sense to me...