Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 10:28 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:54 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7813
Image
Caption: “Bristol Beaufighter IF R2268 modified with twin fins to improve single engine flight characteristics.” Source: BAE Systems

_________________
45+47=Psalm 92:6


Last edited by Mark Allen M on Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 871
Location: Midland, Texas
For what it is worth, from "Bristol Aircraft since 1910" by C H Barnes, page 296:

"The Beaufighter always suffered from low frequency longitudinal instability, particularly on the climb; it was more pronounced on the Beaufighter II which was slightly tail heavy and various remedies were tried, including a wide tail-plane with end-plate fins and rudders on R2268 and a twelve-degree dihedral tail-plane on R2057. The latter was effective, but made the Beaufighter rather too stable for night-fighting, so Fighter Command squadrons generally preferred the flat tail-plane in spite of its discomforts."

Randy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:13 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7813
That Beaufighter twin fin setup looks familiar. Looks like the Lockheed Hudson's twin fins.

Image

Image

_________________
45+47=Psalm 92:6


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:13 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Virginia, US
That reminds me of the Gloster F9/37.

Richard

Image

_________________
I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7813
Image
Lockheed Ventura Mk I of No 21 Squadron RAF 1943.

Image
Lockheed B-34 Lexington (PV-1 Ventura)

_________________
45+47=Psalm 92:6


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:22 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7813
Yes indeed.

Image
Gloster F.9 37 Gloster Reaper

Image
Gloster F.9 37 Gloster Reaper

_________________
45+47=Psalm 92:6


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 271
The passage Randy quoted from the Barnes book is an interesting one, I'd always thought that the Merlin-powered Mk.II was more nose heavy and that the dihedral tailplane was an attempt to add vertical tail area to counter the directional effects of the longer Merlins??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 12:33 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2671
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
Weird looking airplane. Looks like something the French or the Soviets might have come up with.

_________________
Dean Hemphill, K5DH
Port Charlotte, Florida


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2020 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 368
Location: UK
Don't be unkind, we've never designed anything that weird!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2020 5:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:13 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Virginia, US
What, never?
No, never.
What, never?
Hardly ever.

Image

_________________
I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2020 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 368
Location: UK
I admit the Fleet Shadower is seriously ugly and hard to defend, but at least we only built one of them.

Look at some of the absolute eyesores that the French put into production and even service during the 1930s. Most of them are really grim and probably frighten children and horses.

I'm not really sure what horses have got to do with aeroplanes but I think that's the saying anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 871
Location: Midland, Texas
While not exactly "ugly" the Westland Pterodactyl Mark V was certainly unique looking for a projected fighter in 1934. Again, only one prototype. From page 239 of "The British Fighter since 1912" by Francis K. Mason, 1992. Randy

Attachment:
Pterodactyl Mark V.jpg
Pterodactyl Mark V.jpg [ 150.54 KiB | Viewed 1238 times ]


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 238 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group