Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:50 am
Mark Allen M wrote:A few observations that (to me anyway) are undeniable.
1. The F4F was indeed flown by Gayler, but also undeniably shows that another pilots name was painted over to allow Gayler's name to be applied.
2. Same as above for the 'F-5', this proof certainly helps with the argument that this particular F4F could very well have been flown by O'hare. Which is extremely cool.
3. Every aircraft shown in the photos shows where the life rafts were taken out and used to by the crew to abandon ship. You can see this on the F4F fuselage and the TBD wings. Also very interesting.
Quite a time capsule in those photos.
Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:54 am
Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:56 am
lmritger wrote:dakoblue wrote:Ho w this is possible
Somebody's got some 'splainin to do... unless Petrel covered a WHOLE lot more territory than anyone realizes (which seems extremely unlikely). I'm guessing someone just transposed a number... what do you show for 4537 or 4513?
Lynn
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:04 am
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:13 am
lmritger wrote:
This is the earliest BuNo I have yet seen where we have definitive proof of a 34151/Interior Green primer being used as opposed to aluminum lacquer. To quote Joe Biden, this is a big effing deal (at least to me).So this proves that everything from 0291 onwards left the factory with a green interior... that is a whole lot earlier in the production run than I ever imagined.
The crew of the R/V Petrel are my new heroes.![]()
Lynn
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:22 am
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:25 am
lmritger wrote:lmritger wrote:
This is the earliest BuNo I have yet seen where we have definitive proof of a 34151/Interior Green primer being used as opposed to aluminum lacquer. To quote Joe Biden, this is a big effing deal (at least to me).So this proves that everything from 0291 onwards left the factory with a green interior... that is a whole lot earlier in the production run than I ever imagined.
The crew of the R/V Petrel are my new heroes.![]()
Lynn
A question for the hive mind... if a plane went in for depot-level maintenance in 1940, would the fabric control surfaces have been re-covered?
0291 is a pretty early ship (the 23rd built), and we know for a fact that 0300 and the other TBDs which were part of the initial deliveries to VT-2 all carried aluminum lacquer interiors because there are good shots from the factory showing this. Yet here we have 0291 very, very clearly showing green. And it's not just the framing of the rudder; if you look at the rudder traverse area on the fin, there's some green there too.
I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!![]()
![]()
![]()
Lynn
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:27 am
lmritger wrote:lmritger wrote:
This is the earliest BuNo I have yet seen where we have definitive proof of a 34151/Interior Green primer being used as opposed to aluminum lacquer. To quote Joe Biden, this is a big effing deal (at least to me).So this proves that everything from 0291 onwards left the factory with a green interior... that is a whole lot earlier in the production run than I ever imagined.
The crew of the R/V Petrel are my new heroes.![]()
Lynn
A question for the hive mind... if a plane went in for depot-level maintenance in 1940, would the fabric control surfaces have been re-covered?
0291 is a pretty early ship (the 23rd built), and we know for a fact that 0300 and the other TBDs which were part of the initial deliveries to VT-2 all carried aluminum lacquer interiors because there are good shots from the factory showing this. Yet here we have 0291 very, very clearly showing green. And it's not just the framing of the rudder; if you look at the rudder traverse area on the fin, there's some green there too.
I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!![]()
![]()
![]()
Lynn
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:35 am
Dan Jones wrote:Looks like the poor old SBD's and the remains of that one F4F must have been right on top of one of the big explosions on Lex, but the TBD's certainly fared well.
Assuming one did lift a couple of TBD's up to the surface, what's the procedure to then "de-salinate" and stabilize them, and how long does it take? I imagine you'd need a tanker full of fresh water to start. I wonder what those rent for a day?
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:39 am
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:43 am
marine air wrote:Fascinating pics and interesting comments. It may be my imagination, but it seems like the barnacles have focused on the areas of the planes that were collection points for human sweat. On the Wildcat, notice they are centered where the pilot's elbow would've been when flying with the canopy open. Also on the Devastator's vertical fin where the deck hands would be pushing the airplane around by hand. Also the wings where guys would've been folding them manually.
The barnacles seem to be attracted to either human salt/sweat or the organic motor oil used at the time.
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:45 am
Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:00 am
Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:14 am
Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:53 am
Nathan wrote:my deductions on why some aircraft are in better condition then others.
The lone F4F up in front of the fire I suspect is "F-5"(it is away from the fire and totally intact. There is one or two F4Fs behind that one on fire and could be the wreck with just a wing left. There are several SBDs on fire behind the parked F4Fs, and the TBDs aft are void of any fire with their wings folded.