Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 1:10 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2014 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 7:38 pm
Posts: 490
Location: Oklahoma
Didn't they usually adjust the fire to converge at a certain distance and if so what was the usual distance?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2014 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
I think I've read that the usual convergence (and sight-in) distance was around 300 yards but some pilots preferred other distances.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2014 9:38 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:11 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Outer Space
And some didn't like the rounds converging and preferred them shooting straight ahead.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 6:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:07 am
Posts: 282
Location: Grosse Pointe, Michigan
Published references that I have read agree with this distance as a "normal" or standard setting. P-38's didn't have this issue and it has been stated this "point and shoot" feature is why many pilots preferred that aircraft.

Snake45 wrote:
I think I've read that the usual convergence (and sight-in) distance was around 300 yards but some pilots preferred other distances.

_________________
Daviemax
Researcher of Post-War B-17 History
Maintains database of B-17s used from 46- on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 7:38 pm
Posts: 490
Location: Oklahoma
Thanks for the replies. I had wondered if there was an allowance for personal pilot preference or if the distance was mandated by military regs. I have to wonder how any aligning of the guns was done when the need arose on board a carrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 6:39 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Elwyn wrote:
Thanks for the replies. I had wondered if there was an allowance for personal pilot preference or if the distance was mandated by military regs. I have to wonder how any aligning of the guns was done when the need arose on board a carrier.


You can use a reduced range target and boresight. Since the ballistics are well known, and it's pretty simple to figure, if the bullet hits here at 30yds, it should hit here at 300,
I have also read of pilots asking pairs of guns to be set to different convergences. Say, one pair at 325yds, one pair at 300 and one at 275 to give a larger 'beaten area' on softer targets.


Another issue is dissimilar ballistics on aircraft with mixed cannon and MG armament. 20X110 and .50BMG have roughly similar trajectories, but the German MK108 lobbed a shell in a rainbow-like arc compared to the 13 or 15mm guns.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 291 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group