Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 12:50 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 2:04 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
during ww2 were any british royal navy aircraft carriers hit by kamikazes in the pacific?? or bombed from the air by the luftwaffe in the european theater?? there doesn't seem to be much info on the topic. if so what japanese or german aircraft were involved??

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
tom d. friedman wrote:
during ww2 were any british royal navy aircraft carriers hit by kamikazes in the pacific?? or bombed from the air by the luftwaffe in the european theater?? there doesn't seem to be much info on the topic.


From memory, yes, some of our carriers were hit by Japanese kamikaze attacks, I can't remember which carriers though, would need to go and look it up (just had a quick look and only one of our carriers wasn't damaged!)
Of course, because all our carriers had armoured steel decks, any damage was far less severe.

Quote from a USN liason officer:

The USN liaison officer on Indefatigable commented: "When a kamikaze hits a US carrier it means 6 months of repair at Pearl [Harbor]. When a kamikaze hits a Limey carrier it's just a case of 'Sweepers, man your brooms.'”


Here's HMS Formidable on fire after a kamikaze attack

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 331
Location: Ottawa
This article from the Vintage Wings of Canada site has a photo showing the aftermath of the Kamikaze strike on HMS Formidable.

http://www.vintagewings.ca/VintageNews/ ... lours.aspx

_________________
“Try to fly in the middle of the air. The edges are filled with mountains and oceans and rocks and it’s much harder to fly there.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:26 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Almost all of the Royal Navy's fleet carriers were hit by the Luftwaffe, or Kamikaze strikes... several of them on multiple occasions. In all cases, except for HMS Hermes which the Japanese sank in an air attack in the Indian Ocean, all of the Royal Navy's carriers survived their aerial assaults and returned to service... sometimes within a few hours.

Cheers,
Richard

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 2:17 pm
Posts: 37
Tom,

first carrier hit by a kamikaze was HMS Indefatigable. Only reason i remember that piece of trivia was one of the ships veterans lived a few doors away from me and led the remembrance parades locally for many years

more details on the tinterweb

cheers

Clive


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 5:00 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
Illustrious was hit hard by the Luftwaffe trying to relieve Malta. She was actually sent across the Atlantic to Norfolk, Virginia for repairs and a refit. After repairs, she temporarily joined the Pacific fleet with Saratoga as the only two fleet carriers in the Pacific while Enterprise was being repaired from the Santa Cruz battle as well as incorporating numerous improvements. I don't think they saw any major action except for the invasion of Munda.

Wasn't Ark Royal sunk by torpedo carrying Ju-88s?

The British carriers were built tougher because the designers took into consideration that these ships would be exposed to attack from land based aircraft operating in relatively narrow seas like the Mediterranean and off the coast of Europe. The additional toughness came at the expense of range and aircraft carrying capacity, but that wasn't a huge issue operating near England or in the Mediterranean. The Essex class was designed to be more self-sufficient ranging over the much longer distances of the Pacific with a larger air group. The downside, of course, was that their wooden flight decks proved to be very vulnerable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 11:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Benbrook, Texas
The British Carriers, had armored steel decks, while our carriers had wooden decks, for which reason I cant explain.

_________________
Negative Ghost Rider the pattern is full


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 8:15 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
red two wrote:
The British Carriers, had armored steel decks, while our carriers had wooden decks, for which reason I cant explain.

Interesting question. Found some good reading here.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/inde ... 622AAPnyt4

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 9:33 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
excellent link. it answers a lot of questions.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 322 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group