b29flteng wrote:
ME108 Taifun, how about joining the B-29/B-24 Squadron and join us on tour. We work hard and have a lot of fun on tour. In my opinion, we do a better job of education of the public on tour than at an airshow.
The days of Harlingen are long gone and Midland never recaptured it. Will we ever see days like that again? I think not. Lets move forward.
b29flteng, I agree wholeheartedly with you that aircraft on tour do the "best" version of public outreach than any airshow the CAF holds.
I should know - I've spent the past 25 years as a paid professional in Education and Public Outreach/museum education. The more people that see the CAF aircraft the better. That's what has made the CAF unique more than any other museum. We take our "artifacts" out the public.
And I would love to join the B-29/24 Squadron and yes, join you on the tour. That is if I could.
Unfortunately, in the past 5 years I've had to pick up the reins so to speak on the Messerschmitt restoration since my father's passing. As such, I give a lot of time to our sponsor Gruppe working to not only fundraise, but to insure that the bills are paid, work on the continuing maintenance issues we have on the airplane and build up our sponsor group. In the past few years, I've also had to deal with the unexpected death of my brother (a mulit-sponsor) and take on the responsibility of caretaking of my 81-year old mother (also a multi-sponsor). I also have a full-time plus career that keeps me away from the airport and the CAF.

My only "true" vacation (this year) was to spend 7 days this year working 12 hour days at Airshow in Midland on the ramp.
I realize Airshow in Midland has never been the Harlingen show we used to have. I know, I'm the "fuel lady" and the amount of fuel we dispense is minimal compared to Harlingen. We used to pump about 30,000 gallons of avgas in Harlingen compared to about 7,500 gallons just this past year. Sad, but true.
Yes Shep - I've been quite passionate on this subject. Hell, my whole life has been affected by the CAF since I was 16. Airshows, Fly-ins, the restoration of the airplane have all taken precedence over family events (birthdays, graduations, holidays) in my family. We took on multiple restoration projects, invested cash and have all at one time or the other working in volunteer positions (wing leader, PIO Officer, Finance Officer, etc.) within the NM Wing. We dug B-29 parts (windows) out of the desert, so that the B29/24 Squadron had spares. I have personally put in thousands of hours and thousands of dollars into the CAF.
As someone that has several years of non-profit organizational management under my belt, I too know how difficult it is to deal with membership issues, growth and change of an organization. It's tough stuff.
I'm not saying that things don't have to change fellas. Not at all. I just don't like change that is made by a 2-3 vote difference. I don't like a personal motive driving the organization instead of a membership motive changing things. I'm just "not convinced" that the CAF's now planned move is what is BEST for the organization. Take all personalities out of this equation. Is it truly what is best for the CAF?
I hear things like Midland and Odessa aren't supporting the CAF and that is just false. Midland/Odessa came up with millions to bring us to their communities. They are one of the hottest areas of the country right now economically. Which is also why we've had to pay so dearly for a motel room. I also think there have been other folks in Midland and Odessa that were never "tapped" by the CAF for their philanthropic dollars. Even then, all they see is an organization in constant upheaval.
This open argument hasn't helped that cause. I understand that. And I feel bad that I continue to "fight" for what now appears to be a "dead issue."
The amount of dollars that will be needed to be spent to re-open in the new location (at least to me) seem to be wasted dollars. Instead of paying for a move, I'd much prefer that donor dollars were being put into the airplanes of the CAF. The move is supposedly supposed to be "just offices." But every time we discuss this, we keep talking about bringing in tourism dollars (For what? To see Steve Brown's office?)
Millions were spent on building the infrastructure (CAF HQ, the Museum, the Commemorative Center, the Maintenance Hangar, the Memorial Garden and the Parts Depot) in Midland. We finally have an O'Club and we are willing to just "leave it" so that we can build again.
Sorry, I'm not an "empire builder" that embraces these types of expenditures when the organization has a tough enough time coming up with fuel/maintenance/insurance money all the times. I'd rather be gung-ho trying to reduce the expense of the ANUAC funds each unit has to come up with. I'd work on ways that it wasn't so darn expensive to insure our airplanes. I'd work on actually fundraising and getting the development funds necessary to operate the organization. Instead, we go after "brick and mortar money" to start all over.
We've been in Midland just over 20 years. In the 20 years we've been in West Texas (and despite the millions invested into it) the CAF in Midland still (to this day) doesn't have the infrastructure we had in Harlingen. As such, I see this move as being a step backward, instead of forward.
Ultimately, the responsibility now rests with the CAF General Staff since we've given them the decision making authority. I've never been too keen about giving a membership responsibility over to 9 of 11 people. It is a member owned organization after all.
And investment/move like this takes tremendous effort. I just am not convinced the organization can survive this move. As such, fear breaks in and protectionism of what we have becomes paramount.
We just celebrated 50 years of airshow. I'm not convinced that this move will lend itself to another 50 years of the CAF.