RyanShort1 wrote:
I'm sure you guys are right, but I was thinking that some comment was needed to break the tension. I don't know what to think personally about the helicopter, but hey, people can come up with all kinds of crazy ideas to do with stuff. Seems it could have come to some better conclusion if all the people upset now had been given a chance to do something about it.
Ryan
Good-on-ya Ryan, I think the Army could've saved themselves some grief
if only they'd have communicated with the public a bit better on this issue.
They may have sent letters to other museums, or this or that. But what
they failed to do..was inform their funding agents and to some degree or
the other...their fans and supporters...We the Public. The proto XCH-62
may have been paid for by the Army..but they and other bureaucrats keep
forgetting, they go to Congress for a budget, but they get the money from
U.S., the taxpayer. I checked their(our) Army website..
www.armyavnmuseum.org , and I haven't found a News-section, nor a
Gallery of displays. It's a fairly simple website, did I miss a notification
to the ArmyAir supporters-at-large of their desire to quit the caretaking
of the mock-up?? If there were an archive section I'd look for it there...but
alas..non.
Some of us look for any tidbits we can, of artifacts in danger, but when it's
treated like a secret, then we can't help them.
If anything, the rotorhead assembled with the blades would have made a
bold display if it was suspended in a hanger over museum airplanes or
helicopters. Several lost chances all the way around...