Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:37 am
Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:46 am
Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:06 am
Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:33 am
Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:57 am
Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:48 pm
Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:55 pm
shepsair wrote:.......though it looks like after months of delay the next recovery has been rubber stamped.![]()
Better find out about dates and tickets.![]()
MS
Wed Sep 26, 2012 12:01 am
Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:06 am
Chris Brame wrote:I hope so too. (And I'm still hoping for that O-38D to be brought up.)
In the meantime, has anyone tried to do some photo documentation of the many other Navy planes still on the bottom? I know the TBFs and SNJs aren't going to be recovered but it would be interesting to see a few of them (you'd think leaving them in situ would be enough to satisfy the leave-em-to-the-zebra-mussels crowd!).
Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:19 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:26 am
Noha307 wrote:I don't know how many people know this, but there's a piece of military equipment that I would say is actually something even more important! (Not to say the aircraft aren't highly important -they are.) A WWI German U-boat! A&T Salvage were the one's that found it as well. (http://www.atrecovery.com/Pages/GermanUBoat.htm) It would be awesome to recover, but they would have to find a museum to take it first. (I thought it would be cool if Chicago MSI acquired it and put it on display next to U-505- but that ain't gonna happen.)
By the way, I e-mailed A&T back on May 8th of this year after reading a report on their website about the Midway survivor SBD. (http://www.atrecovery.com/Images/2106/D ... rt2106.pdf - it's a bit long - 171 pagesbut if you got time to kill it's an interesting read) The report mentioned photographs and diagrams, but I couldn't find them on the website. Anyway, to finish a story described in more detail than it needs to be, they said that they hoped to update their website soon.
Finally, I'm kinda confused, were the new rules meant to prevent environmental damage, damage to the aircraft, or both?
Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:37 am
Noha307 wrote:I don't know how many people know this, but there's a piece of military equipment that I would say is actually something even more important! (Not to say the aircraft aren't highly important -they are.) A WWI German U-boat! A&T Salvage were the one's that found it as well. (http://www.atrecovery.com/Pages/GermanUBoat.htm) It would be awesome to recover, but they would have to find a museum to take it first. (I thought it would be cool if Chicago MSI acquired it and put it on display next to U-505- but that ain't gonna happen.)
By the way, I e-mailed A&T back on May 8th of this year after reading a report on their website about the Midway survivor SBD. (http://www.atrecovery.com/Images/2106/D ... rt2106.pdf - it's a bit long - 171 pagesbut if you got time to kill it's an interesting read) The report mentioned photographs and diagrams, but I couldn't find them on the website. Anyway, to finish a story described in more detail than it needs to be, they said that they hoped to update their website soon.
Finally, I'm kinda confused, were the new rules meant to prevent environmental damage, damage to the aircraft, or both?
Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:38 am
Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:42 am
Mon Oct 01, 2012 2:16 pm
RickH wrote:Supposedly, the new rules were put in place to allow a mechanism for salvage. If an aircraft was found that didn't have significant individual history, the NHC now has a way release the item to the petitioner for salvage. It also applies to the USAF, where the petition is rubber stamped OK at Maxwell AFB.