Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:43 pm
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:11 pm
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:19 pm
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:39 pm
Travisd80elcam wrote: B-24M (s/n 44-42067) is a derelict at Belem.[39]
Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:23 am
gary1954 wrote:Back years ago when I read air classics maggotzine (refuse to read ANY challenge publication since 1976) I read an article of a B-24 that had been discovered in a lake here in the US, I want to say to was in the western region of the country. This B-24 was on a training mission and encountered IFR weather below them the pilot flew around for a while while some of the crew looked below the plane through the bomb bay section with the doors opened and found a break where he let down. with fuel running out the crew may have saw what may have appeared to him to be a snow covered field but actually belly landed on a snow covered frozen lake. The bombers tail from aft of the bomb bay section flipped over the main fuselage and back into the water. It sunk quickly with (IIRCC) no survivors. It wasn't discovered until the lake had gone down so far that the verticle stabilizers protruded the surface and peeked the curiosity of the locals. The remains of the tailgunner were still in the turret (don't know about the rest of the crew). I have often wanted to be able to recall the location of this find, and what ever became of the remains of the aircraft and crew, but it was now a long time ago that I read the article. I know it wasn't in Alaska, but do recall that it was west of Texas, which really narrows it down now don't it.
Well thats all I have to add.....Bueller? .......Bueller?
Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:21 am
Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:57 am
Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:25 am
gary1954 wrote:Back years ago when I read air classics maggotzine (refuse to read ANY challenge publication since 1976) I read an article of a B-24 that had been discovered in a lake here in the US, I want to say to was in the western region of the country. This B-24 was on a training mission and encountered IFR weather below them the pilot flew around for a while while some of the crew looked below the plane through the bomb bay section with the doors opened and found a break where he let down. with fuel running out the crew may have saw what may have appeared to him to be a snow covered field but actually belly landed on a snow covered frozen lake. The bombers tail from aft of the bomb bay section flipped over the main fuselage and back into the water. It sunk quickly with (IIRCC) no survivors. It wasn't discovered until the lake had gone down so far that the verticle stabilizers protruded the surface and peeked the curiosity of the locals. The remains of the tailgunner were still in the turret (don't know about the rest of the crew). Well thats all I have to add.....Bueller? .......Bueller?
Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:44 am
cooper9411 wrote:The B-24 that is on Atka is going to remain where it is at. A few years ago I was co-ordinating with a museum to recover it. The proper paperwork was filed with the appropriate government offices and after I had a couple meetings with the museums board members and shared the information about the paperwork with the government, I didn't hear anything from the museum for a couple weeks, couldn't get a phone call returned or an e-mail answered. Finally I called one of the members of the museum at his day job and he informed me that the museum took the information I provided (while under the premise we were working together) and decided to try a recovery attempt on their own. I called the government office and the lady in charge stated " you contacted this office first, you submitted a recovery proposal first, I can see what they (the museum) are trying to do. Re-do your proposal and send it to me". I re-did the proposal in a matter of a few days and sent it to the government office. The lady at the government office said that her office talked to locals who were not against the recovery. The lady at the government office took my revised proposal (the one without the museum being a part of) and said " This office needs to see verification that you have secured funding for the recovery, if you have funding ownership will transferred to you. If you do not have the funding the aircraft will stay were it's at." Well, I didn't have $100k-$150k just sitting around, so the plane is still there. Maybe if the museum would not have greedy the B-24 could be well on it's way to being restored.
Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:41 am
cooper9411 wrote:...Well, I didn't have $100k-$150k just sitting around, so the plane is still there. Maybe if the museum would not have greedy the B-24 could be well on it's way to being restored.
Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:07 pm
Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:40 pm
Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:47 pm
Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:57 pm
Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:36 pm